In Reply to: RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... posted by Tony Lauck on January 31, 2016 at 13:16:08:
So only people at CERN or other physics labs at national standards bureaux are capable of measuring things? If so, how on earth do equipment manufactures get any work done? ;-)
I disagree that measurements made with less than SOTA equipment have no value. Perhaps measurements made with SOTA equipment may be more valuable, but even poor equipment can be capable of giving us a "ball park" measurement, and perhaps the ball park estimate is good enough to allow us to make a judgment.
In the case at hand, Archimago has shown that the differences between the formats, if any, are more than -70dB down in the mix. That may not be the precise figure, but it at least tells us the differences, if any, are small.
JE
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 14:33:31 01/31/16 (9)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - ahendler 18:31:01 01/31/16 (8)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 19:22:01 01/31/16 (7)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 12:05:05 02/01/16 (6)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 19:44:26 02/01/16 (0)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 14:21:08 02/01/16 (4)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 15:24:21 02/01/16 (3)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 04:55:29 02/02/16 (2)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - jkeny 05:14:14 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 07:36:33 02/02/16 (0)