|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... posted by Jaundiced Ear on January 27, 2016 at 19:50:44:
Abe has a valid point that Archimago's test equipment is not up to the task of measuring hi-res digital audio sources. However, Abe's point is irrelevant to this topic since Archimago is simply analyzing the files in software and not measuring anything.
I think his analysis is fine for what it is, but it doesn't really shed any light on the more controversial claims of MQA. Claims such as "MQA corrects for errors at the A/D and D/A stages" are unverifiable via any real world measurement system that I can think of. Which is quite convenient for Meridian and all the press that have joined the marketing effort, and guarantees that we'll be arguing about this in audio forums for some time.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 04:31:54 01/28/16 (6)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 18:45:20 01/28/16 (3)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 04:58:03 02/02/16 (2)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Jaundiced Ear 21:18:41 02/02/16 (1)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 07:44:33 02/03/16 (0)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Fitzcaraldo215 08:03:22 01/28/16 (1)
- RE: How is Archimago's equipment not "up to the task"... - Dave_K 14:18:45 02/02/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
