In Reply to: RE: RRE: "the sound of the hall before the first note was played"? posted by Isaak J. Garvey on January 24, 2016 at 10:05:08:
Isn't "high(er) rez" always superior to low(er) rez?
Supposedly, better/finer detail retrieval supports a more lifelike record listening experience. After perusing through audiophile forums like this one, the impression I get is that the very last iota of resolution matters quite a bit...
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "What does any of that have to do with musical enjoyment?" - genungo 10:40:57 01/24/16 (12)
- No Res - Tony Lauck 17:40:39 01/25/16 (0)
- RE: "What does any of that have to do with musical enjoyment?" - Isaak J. Garvey 12:35:35 01/24/16 (0)
- RE: "What does any of that have to do with musical enjoyment?" - jkeny 12:02:21 01/24/16 (0)
- RE: "What does any of that have to do with musical enjoyment?" - Isaak J. Garvey 10:45:10 01/24/16 (8)
- You're way off! - Chris from Lafayette 08:09:15 01/25/16 (5)
- RE: You're way off! - ahendler 11:42:43 01/25/16 (4)
- Chris like the sound of Brownian motion... - Ivan303 08:34:50 01/26/16 (2)
- . . . only if it's the right kind of Brown - Chris from Lafayette 21:34:27 01/26/16 (1)
- She was a 'sweetie', that's for sure... - Ivan303 07:32:42 01/27/16 (0)
- Discrete values - how else? - Chris from Lafayette 17:04:41 01/25/16 (0)
- RE: "Does 192/24 really have 4X the resolution of 44/16?" - genungo 10:53:44 01/24/16 (1)
- RE: "Does 192/24 really have 4X the resolution of 44/16?" - Isaak J. Garvey 10:55:04 01/24/16 (0)