In Reply to: RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? posted by Tony Lauck on June 23, 2015 at 10:28:11:
Well, it's harder compare two audio samples than compare two pictures, I'll give you that. However, if I took a 24MP RAW image, downsampled it to 6MP and wrote it out as a HQ JPEG, and then sent both files to a print shop, I suspect you couldn't tell which was which.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 10:53:42 06/24/15 (15)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 20:18:23 06/24/15 (14)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Dave_K 13:51:28 06/25/15 (4)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 19:33:05 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 14:54:01 06/25/15 (2)
- I don't think that's true - Dave_K 04:00:04 06/26/15 (1)
- RE: I don't think that's true - Abstraction 07:09:33 06/26/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 08:15:54 06/25/15 (8)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Jaundiced Ear 19:38:16 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 09:52:19 06/25/15 (6)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 10:43:23 06/25/15 (5)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 11:12:13 06/25/15 (3)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - fmak 22:03:35 06/25/15 (0)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Tony Lauck 12:00:59 06/25/15 (1)
- RE: You know what's interesting about digital photography? - Abstraction 12:06:16 06/25/15 (0)
- Exactly (nt) - Dave_K 11:07:18 06/25/15 (0)