In Reply to: OK, let's get back to basic logic here posted by Jaundiced Ear on April 18, 2015 at 08:22:18:
OK, let's get back to basic logic here
Er, that's what I was trying to do in light of your contradictory argument. You respond by changing the subject.
Folks, science doesn't happen only inside your heads. It's patent and available to all. It is tangible and reproducible. It has no need for childish claims
With respect, you can patronise as much as you like but your knowledge of psychology is almost as barren as your grasp of logic. You wouldn't know a "null hypothesis" if it ran you over - the null hypothesis that "these things" do nothing substantive would be advanced by someone setting out to design an experiment to prove that they did. That's why, so help me, it's called a null hypothesis. Outwith the experimental context, the term is all but meaningless (see above).
I've had enough of this childish prattle. I'm out of here.
D
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: OK, let's get back to basic logic here - Ryelands 09:20:01 04/18/15 (1)
- RE: OK, let's get back to basic logic here - Mercman 11:19:07 04/18/15 (0)