In Reply to: RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs posted by Sprezza Tura on April 2, 2015 at 21:02:47:
They're just files, so why can't he burn them to a CD?That said, I don't know what might play them i.e. decode the FLAC and also output the 24-bit audio; I've never tried it, all my 24-bit FLACs are only on HDDs.
Also, a typical pop/rock album at e.g. 96/24 probably wouldn't fit on a CD, 48/24 usually should. Practicality be damned...you can do it even if hardly anybody does, maybe burning to DVD would be better. I kinda doubt any gadget that could decode/play 24-bit FLACs [edit: from CD] also couldn't do it from a DVD (cheaper than CDs now too).
Edits: 04/03/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - cfraser 08:31:45 04/03/15 (8)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - Sprezza Tura 08:41:19 04/03/15 (7)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - cfraser 11:17:48 04/05/15 (3)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - Sprezza Tura 17:24:59 04/05/15 (2)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - merlinus 11:21:24 04/06/15 (1)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - Say 07:00:12 04/08/15 (0)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - merlinus 11:08:16 04/03/15 (2)
- Thanks for the info on Brasero - bullethead 05:04:35 04/05/15 (0)
- RE: 24 vs. 16-bit flacs - Sprezza Tura 12:57:05 04/03/15 (0)