In Reply to: Sound Quality vs. Bling posted by Tony Lauck on February 23, 2015 at 11:55:30:
I wouldn't call good library management "Bling" but a fundamental requirement of a music server for anyone who has thousands of music files.
I don't believe that good library management and quality sound have to be mutually exclusive. If this were the case, we should all give up on computers for managing our music and go back to the inconveniences of storing and spinning vinyl.
As with any engineering endeavor there are trade-offs and decisions that are made based on the end goal and there are weightings placed on the components and features that get you there. Bling is not one of them but a good library manager is very important to many people in this very forum.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sound Quality vs. Features - AbeCollins 12:19:58 02/23/15 (7)
- RE: Sound Quality vs. Features - Old Listener 11:14:48 02/24/15 (5)
- RE: "Recorded music in any form is a convenience relative to live music." - rick_m 09:33:53 02/27/15 (4)
- RE: "Recorded music in any form is a convenience relative to live music." - Tony Lauck 15:14:41 02/28/15 (0)
- RE: "Recorded music in any form is a convenience relative to live music." - Ryelands 04:10:24 02/28/15 (1)
- RE: "Recorded music in any form is a convenience relative to live music." - rick_m 20:30:04 02/28/15 (0)
- RE: "Recorded music in any form is a convenience relative to live music." - Old Listener 16:13:07 02/27/15 (0)
- RE: Sound Quality vs. Features - Bob_C 22:06:47 02/23/15 (0)