In Reply to: Look at figure 2! posted by Goober58 on January 26, 2015 at 14:48:24:
One was downsampled from the 88 kHz file, the other by recording with the same model ADC as the 88 kHz file but with a different clock speed. Right?
How would you modify this test to address your concerns? And what evidence would you accept that, indeed, the perceived differences are due to the sample rate rather than the other factors you imagine?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Two 44 kHz files were produced - Beetlemania 15:12:57 01/26/15 (1)
- Yes - but I thought I address all this in my original post to this topic - Goober58 16:37:23 01/26/15 (0)