|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: Don't forget this study presented posted by E-Stat on January 26, 2015 at 13:03:53:
Not sure the study proves anything other than that the converters and down sampling algorithms may impose a sonic signature. I appreciate the fact that the article itself raises those points.I would think that down sampling a higher rate recording would help negate any effects that the required filtering might have in the audible range.
So based on the results it seems the converters are pretty close but the decimation algorithm didn't work perform so well.
So though the tests prove listeners could hear a difference it does not conclusively prove the reasons for those differences.
Edits: 01/26/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Goober58 13:37:41 01/26/15 (30)
- You need to read it again - E-Stat 13:49:38 01/26/15 (29)
- Clearly the results show differences are being heard but what does that prove? - Goober58 14:01:40 01/26/15 (28)
- Yo, Goob ! - E-Stat 14:11:08 01/26/15 (27)
- Look at figure 2! - Goober58 16:33:16 01/26/15 (10)
- Cluelessness, Part Deux - E-Stat 16:49:55 01/26/15 (9)
- RE: Cluelessness, Part Deux - Tony Lauck 18:10:45 01/26/15 (5)
- Not sure why we want to test - E-Stat 18:22:10 01/26/15 (4)
- RE: Not sure why we want to test - Tony Lauck 18:40:31 01/26/15 (3)
- Perhaps you might read the linked article - E-Stat 19:40:43 01/26/15 (2)
- RE: Perhaps you might read the linked article - Tony Lauck 09:08:03 01/27/15 (1)
- Thanks for the eval - E-Stat 09:28:05 01/27/15 (0)
- Wow! But thanks for doing the work for me - Goober58 17:34:53 01/26/15 (2)
- "It wasn't my intention to introduce a straw man " - E-Stat 18:03:08 01/26/15 (1)
- RE: "It wasn't my intention to introduce a straw man " - Goober58 18:52:25 01/26/15 (0)
- Look at figure 2! - Goober58 14:48:24 01/26/15 (12)
- Two 44 kHz files were produced - Beetlemania 15:12:57 01/26/15 (1)
- Yes - but I thought I address all this in my original post to this topic - Goober58 16:37:23 01/26/15 (0)
- Hmmm... - E-Stat 15:00:33 01/26/15 (9)
- RE: Hmmm... - Goober58 17:02:10 01/26/15 (8)
- Gimme a break - E-Stat 17:10:12 01/26/15 (7)
- Sounds like you need one.... - Goober58 17:40:58 01/26/15 (6)
- Perhaps one of you - E-Stat 18:18:13 01/26/15 (5)
- RE: Perhaps one of you - Goober58 18:42:45 01/26/15 (4)
- At the expense of confusing the obvious (again) - E-Stat 19:47:22 01/26/15 (3)
- Excuse me - Goober58 20:18:39 01/26/15 (2)
- It is past your bedtime and you're incoherent - E-Stat 20:27:22 01/26/15 (1)
- All of my comments have been about the whole test - not a cherry picked portion of it! - Goober58 20:44:12 01/26/15 (0)
- The abstract clearly states - Beetlemania 14:24:06 01/26/15 (2)
- RE: The abstract clearly states - Goober58 17:50:56 01/26/15 (0)
- Exactly! - E-Stat 14:35:42 01/26/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
