|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
|
|
Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Me too! posted by John Atkinson on January 26, 2015 at 11:10:56:
four years ago from your native side of the pond. :)Notice that it compares a range of recordings of the same content at different resolutions. Which rules out the "it all is due to mastering differences" canard. It really doesn't matter how many studies are paraded about that don't support the ability to hear differences between Redbook and higher resolution formats. All it really takes is one or two valid ones to establish that it can_be_done.
That not every listener is able to or every piece of music benefits should be obvious to all.
Edits: 01/26/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Don't forget this study presented - E-Stat 13:03:53 01/26/15 (38)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - John Atkinson 04:24:46 01/27/15 (5)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Goober58 16:33:57 01/27/15 (2)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Dave_K 07:10:06 01/28/15 (1)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Goober58 09:55:05 01/28/15 (0)
- Exactly - E-Stat 12:49:54 01/27/15 (0)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Sprezza Tura 08:04:51 01/27/15 (0)
- RE: Don't forget this study presented - Goober58 13:37:41 01/26/15 (30)
- You need to read it again - E-Stat 13:49:38 01/26/15 (29)
- Clearly the results show differences are being heard but what does that prove? - Goober58 14:01:40 01/26/15 (28)
- Yo, Goob ! - E-Stat 14:11:08 01/26/15 (27)
- Look at figure 2! - Goober58 16:33:16 01/26/15 (10)
- Cluelessness, Part Deux - E-Stat 16:49:55 01/26/15 (9)
- RE: Cluelessness, Part Deux - Tony Lauck 18:10:45 01/26/15 (5)
- Not sure why we want to test - E-Stat 18:22:10 01/26/15 (4)
- RE: Not sure why we want to test - Tony Lauck 18:40:31 01/26/15 (3)
- Perhaps you might read the linked article - E-Stat 19:40:43 01/26/15 (2)
- RE: Perhaps you might read the linked article - Tony Lauck 09:08:03 01/27/15 (1)
- Thanks for the eval - E-Stat 09:28:05 01/27/15 (0)
- Wow! But thanks for doing the work for me - Goober58 17:34:53 01/26/15 (2)
- "It wasn't my intention to introduce a straw man " - E-Stat 18:03:08 01/26/15 (1)
- RE: "It wasn't my intention to introduce a straw man " - Goober58 18:52:25 01/26/15 (0)
- Look at figure 2! - Goober58 14:48:24 01/26/15 (12)
- Two 44 kHz files were produced - Beetlemania 15:12:57 01/26/15 (1)
- Yes - but I thought I address all this in my original post to this topic - Goober58 16:37:23 01/26/15 (0)
- Hmmm... - E-Stat 15:00:33 01/26/15 (9)
- RE: Hmmm... - Goober58 17:02:10 01/26/15 (8)
- Gimme a break - E-Stat 17:10:12 01/26/15 (7)
- Sounds like you need one.... - Goober58 17:40:58 01/26/15 (6)
- Perhaps one of you - E-Stat 18:18:13 01/26/15 (5)
- RE: Perhaps one of you - Goober58 18:42:45 01/26/15 (4)
- At the expense of confusing the obvious (again) - E-Stat 19:47:22 01/26/15 (3)
- Excuse me - Goober58 20:18:39 01/26/15 (2)
- It is past your bedtime and you're incoherent - E-Stat 20:27:22 01/26/15 (1)
- All of my comments have been about the whole test - not a cherry picked portion of it! - Goober58 20:44:12 01/26/15 (0)
- The abstract clearly states - Beetlemania 14:24:06 01/26/15 (2)
- RE: The abstract clearly states - Goober58 17:50:56 01/26/15 (0)
- Exactly! - E-Stat 14:35:42 01/26/15 (0)
- Thanks for the link - Beetlemania 13:10:44 01/26/15 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
