In Reply to: RE: An insolent provocation .... if a usb dac is very well design (and built) the pc quality should not matter posted by Tony Lauck on December 12, 2014 at 10:35:53:
Hi,
> I'm sure some of the crypto circuit designers have a handle on
> this problem. I never got close to those particular spooks, however.
I suspect they do, from a different angle. But Deep Crypto scares me, the people into in are a bit odd.
> As you pointed out, there are optical transmitters and receivers
> that work at multiple gigabit rates.
But not necessarily ones optimised to carry 50MHz/50MBPS signals with low jitter, or at prices that make inclusion in relatively inexpensive commercial equipment feasible.
> There are probably other suitable design techniques to deal
> with power/ground noise affecting signal transitions, or somehow
> decorrelating the noise from the musical signal, thereby
> rendering it benign.
Yes, but that does not really help with things that can only isolation (or breaking the noise loops in other ways) can fix.
What we (Computer Audio) need are commoditised USB2.0 High Speed isolators OR good isolators for I2S style digital signals up to 100MHz that do not operate based on RFI producing principles and have low jitter.
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: An insolent provocation .... if a usb dac is very well design (and built) the pc quality should not matter - Thorsten 03:52:07 12/13/14 (2)
- RE: An insolent provocation .... if a usb dac is very well design (and built) the pc quality should not matter - Tony Lauck 09:41:08 12/13/14 (1)
- RE: An insolent provocation .... if a usb dac is very well design (and built) the pc quality should not matter - Thorsten 10:39:18 12/13/14 (0)