In Reply to: DSD to PCM at 352.8 is not bad posted by fmak on November 22, 2014 at 02:33:34:
My DAC doesn't play 352.8. So I had to reconvert to DSD. It is possible that most of the degradation that I heard came on the reconversion to DSD rather than the downconversion to 352.8.
I do know that conversion from DSD to 352.8 and back to DSD is not transparent, as can be determined by playing the two files. Also, this is known by recording engineers such as the people at Channel Classics. As a result they try to do all the mixing in the analog console connected to the microphone preamplifiers so they can issue pure DSD recordings. Sometimes, however, it is necessary to remix and this involves the trip through 352.8.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: DSD to PCM at 352.8 is not bad - Tony Lauck 13:54:38 11/22/14 (3)
- RE: DSD to PCM at 352.8 is not bad - Thorsten 00:42:15 11/23/14 (2)
- RE: DSD to PCM at 352.8 is not bad - Sprezza Tura 07:47:57 11/23/14 (1)
- RE: DSD to PCM at 352.8 is not bad - Thorsten 03:44:17 11/26/14 (0)