In Reply to: RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... posted by Tony Lauck on September 21, 2014 at 07:35:34:
"The processing required to decode FLAC is less than the processing required to decode MP3, despite the extra data that has to be moved."
While that may be true (never investigated it), the end result is what matters......
"You must have had a very poor implementation of FLAC for it to sound worse than MP3, or perhaps one of those recordings where the MP3 sounds better than the original CD."
I've tried quite a few implementations.... Any recommendations?
It's difficult enough getting the jitter under control with non-compressed data..... Why complicate matters?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... - Todd Krieger 10:35:18 09/21/14 (4)
- RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... - Tony Lauck 11:36:38 09/21/14 (3)
- RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... - Todd Krieger 09:21:18 09/22/14 (2)
- RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... - Bob_C 13:58:09 11/04/14 (0)
- RE: Disagree with the FLAC Recs......... - Old SteveA 10:12:46 09/22/14 (0)