In Reply to: You're right: it's your conclusions that are exaggerated posted by Sordidman on October 17, 2014 at 13:48:44:
Hi,
> As a manufacturer, - you should be held to a higher standard.
Why. I am calling them as I see them, hear them, without any other agenda.
I don't even have a dog in this race, all my products work equally well with any number of sources, general purpose Computers as well as streamers.
If you have solid evidence that shows that the points I make are incorrect I will be the first to stand corrected and you know that.
However, what I am reading are not rational well reasoned arguments that provide evidence that how I see and hear things happens to be wrong, but invective and claims I cannot know what I am writing, cannot hear, am ignorant etc.
All these are not arguments that cut the mustard, even if they were true (which they incidentally are not), as they are off topic.
> 1. With an off-the-shelf computer, - the consumer greatly
> modifies it to the point where it is no longer a multi-purpose
> device.
It depends.
I must say I am impressed with the results I am getting streaming audio via a 5GHz network from my AV machine acting as server via our new Router and a 399 USD Smartphone (Phone and Bluetooth turned off, all un-needed tasks killed).
And that is absolutely unmodified (you cannot modify it, it cannot be opened except with special gear, as it water and dustproof to IP58), not even the OS is modified. While I use a different App than the bundled one for HD, I am also surprised how decent the buid in Walkman App sounds, playing from network and SD-Card.
I also often enough use laptops/notebooks that are completely unmodified and only use a specific dual boot setup so they have an "Audio Only" software setup.
So there is no physical modification needed.
Software modification, maybe.
> 2. With one of the 4 streamers under discussion, - the high end
> audio manufacturer starts from a single purpose, & either has built
> custom for her/him, a mainboard, or uses a "stripped down" single
> purpose mainboard and adds the other components that make up the
> device. (Often, it is difficult or impossible to use the mainboard
> for any OTHER PURPOSE).
If I use a generic CPU (with build in Video and other subsystems), generic RAM, generic Flash Memory, generic network and USB Chips and I am running a generic OS, tweaked a little for Audio, how is this different from a generic computer runing a customised OS?
I mean other than the packaging?
If the packaging matters to you, or you cannot bebothered to deal with the software, don't get a computer.
Worse, if I use this generic Platform and I then do not even implement a tiny fraction of the measures that can be readily applied to generic PC Platforms, how does it make it "better" then a tricked out PC?
Of course, we would have to listen.
My listening so far, using my own DAC designs, in my own system and at shows/shop's has not produced any ADVANTAGE for any supposedly purpose build streamer, over the computers I use. They are usually no worse either.
> Wouldn't it be easier to comment from a basis of knowledge?
It is better, which is why I generally do it that way.
> The folks at Meitner, APL, ESOTERIC, Zanden, and Berkeley Design
> are all very, very, familiar with each other's work.
And?
What under g*d's wide and open sky has that to do with the price of tea in China or Generic Computer vs. Generic Computer repackaged as Streamer vs. other options (e.g. SD Card/Flash memory players)?
Thor
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to intolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- my conclusions are what they are, you are not showing any contrary evidence - Thorsten 02:19:38 10/18/14 (83)
- I am not making any claims. Experience = knowledge - Sordidman 09:21:28 10/20/14 (2)
- RE: I am not making any claims. Experience = knowledge - Tony Lauck 18:22:04 10/20/14 (1)
- yes: A priori vs A posteriori in audio playback - the 2nd is most - Sordidman 18:47:12 10/21/14 (0)
- this is just a set of - fmak 00:11:17 10/19/14 (2)
- Pot, Kettle, Black nt - Tony Lauck 08:04:51 10/19/14 (0)
- RE: this is just a set of - Thorsten 00:29:32 10/19/14 (0)
- The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Tony Lauck 08:34:26 10/18/14 (76)
- right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - Sordidman 17:21:22 10/19/14 (27)
- Plextor!! LOL - fmak 22:09:29 10/19/14 (1)
- RE: Plextor!! LOL - Tony Lauck 18:29:42 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - Tony Lauck 18:42:49 10/19/14 (24)
- People with experience hear these products under a - Sordidman 09:28:19 10/20/14 (4)
- RE: People with experience hear these products under a - Tony Lauck 10:41:51 10/20/14 (3)
- Appreciate your comments: But they are out of scope - Sordidman 11:29:24 10/20/14 (2)
- RE: Appreciate your comments: But they are out of scope - Tony Lauck 11:42:02 10/20/14 (1)
- RE: Appreciate your comments: But they are out of scope - Sprezza Tura 12:10:39 10/20/14 (0)
- DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - fmak 22:07:10 10/19/14 (14)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Tony Lauck 09:22:54 10/20/14 (13)
- Why expect heroic DAC engineering to overcome a flawed interface? - Dave_K 08:40:24 10/21/14 (3)
- RE: Why expect heroic DAC engineering to overcome a flawed interface? - fmak 22:03:52 10/21/14 (1)
- Hey Fred - Sordidman 14:50:55 10/22/14 (0)
- RE: Why expect heroic DAC engineering to overcome a flawed interface? - Tony Lauck 12:36:14 10/21/14 (0)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Bob_C 23:11:31 10/20/14 (7)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - fmak 03:34:46 10/21/14 (6)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Sprezza Tura 07:28:53 10/21/14 (0)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Tony Lauck 06:54:48 10/21/14 (4)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Sprezza Tura 07:32:44 10/21/14 (2)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Tony Lauck 07:40:15 10/21/14 (1)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - Sprezza Tura 07:43:17 10/21/14 (0)
- RE: DACs using SPDIF are broken by design - fmak 07:25:34 10/21/14 (0)
- WaveIO = e99 + post + wait - fmak 21:59:10 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - Sprezza Tura 19:15:53 10/19/14 (3)
- RE: right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - Tony Lauck 20:28:42 10/19/14 (2)
- RE: right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - Sprezza Tura 20:41:23 10/19/14 (1)
- RE: right:VRDS NEO sounds the same as a Plextor!! LOL - fmak 22:11:26 10/19/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Thorsten 11:45:32 10/18/14 (40)
- In my own house I use LED Lamps - fmak 22:57:29 10/20/14 (4)
- RE: In my own house I use LED Lamps - Thorsten 07:23:46 10/21/14 (3)
- RE: In my own house I use LED Lamps - fmak 22:07:23 10/21/14 (2)
- RE: In my own house I use LED Lamps - Thorsten 03:13:22 10/22/14 (1)
- Not worth wasting my digits in response - fmak 04:05:06 10/22/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Tony Lauck 13:51:07 10/18/14 (34)
- But you would never know, - so why guess? - Sordidman 09:38:32 10/20/14 (30)
- RE: But you would never know, - so why guess? - Bob_C 23:21:50 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: But you would never know, - so why guess? - Tony Lauck 10:09:28 10/20/14 (28)
- Because some transports sound better than others - Sordidman 11:45:21 10/20/14 (27)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Tony Lauck 12:12:52 10/20/14 (17)
- your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sordidman 14:44:51 10/20/14 (16)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Tony Lauck 17:45:37 10/20/14 (15)
- Nope: less read errors due to less disc wobble -t - Sordidman 20:11:02 10/20/14 (11)
- RE: Nope: less read errors due to less disc wobble -t - Tony Lauck 20:50:03 10/20/14 (10)
- Nope: still errors, & less with VRDS wi live playback - Sordidman 21:39:16 10/20/14 (9)
- RE: Nope: still errors, & less with VRDS wi live playback - Tony Lauck 07:29:35 10/21/14 (8)
- You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sordidman 10:00:01 10/21/14 (7)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 12:10:29 10/23/14 (5)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 12:56:26 10/23/14 (4)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 14:58:59 10/23/14 (3)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 17:10:17 10/23/14 (2)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Tony Lauck 19:41:00 10/23/14 (1)
- RE: You don't use listen tests to determine data errors - Sprezza Tura 07:49:12 10/24/14 (0)
- I feel sorry for TL - fmak 05:58:24 10/23/14 (0)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sprezza Tura 18:05:18 10/20/14 (2)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Tony Lauck 18:53:49 10/20/14 (1)
- RE: your assumption is erroneous: born out by experience - Sprezza Tura 19:28:15 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 12:07:01 10/20/14 (8)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sordidman 15:05:57 10/20/14 (7)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 15:47:11 10/20/14 (6)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Tony Lauck 19:06:48 10/20/14 (5)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 19:25:57 10/20/14 (4)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Bob_C 23:30:56 10/20/14 (3)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 07:30:41 10/21/14 (2)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Bob_C 08:49:28 10/21/14 (1)
- RE: Because some transports sound better than others - Sprezza Tura 09:01:32 10/21/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - rick_m 09:15:12 10/19/14 (2)
- I agree - fmak 23:18:50 10/19/14 (1)
- As you have so rightly, and repeatedly, pointed out - Sordidman 09:46:52 10/20/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Sprezza Tura 08:58:35 10/18/14 (6)
- Some inmates do not - fmak 23:20:39 10/19/14 (0)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Tony Lauck 10:46:45 10/18/14 (4)
- RE: The problem is the method used to evaluate DACs and digital sources - Sprezza Tura 11:08:27 10/18/14 (3)
- Audio Note - fmak 23:23:03 10/19/14 (2)
- RE: Audio Note - Bob_C 23:37:13 10/20/14 (1)
- Many people do to some degree... - fmak 03:40:26 10/21/14 (0)