In Reply to: Redbook Proven to be not transparent posted by Tony Lauck on September 13, 2014 at 10:06:18:
There seems to be passionate support for both 'sides' of this discussion. However, I'm not prepared to accept the word of one unknown individual over my own experiences on any subject, not even when his findings agree with my own. And given that we have the tools to do our own digging, and that the results of such digging will be unique for each of us, I don't see that we should even contemplate it.
There's an "I owe an apology to BIS" thread in the HiRez Asylum, after a few public trashings of a new piece of equipment the OP had his hearing tested and discovered that his ears were at fault. For many people there is going to be no benefit gained from Higher-res audio, either due to physical impairment of unsuitable equipment.
I have an image of speakers topped with various colours of lights that represent the frequencies a listener can't hear.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Subjective objectivity - Storris 12:46:51 09/13/14 (2)
- RE: Subjective objectivity - Tony Lauck 13:31:09 09/13/14 (1)
- RE: Subjective objectivity - Storris 15:06:06 09/13/14 (0)