In Reply to: RE: This seems easy posted by Storris on September 12, 2014 at 00:00:14:
What is also important, is that the market has accepted the least optimal solution.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: This seems easy - Storris 00:32:37 09/12/14 (39)
- RE: This seems easy - Mercman 03:26:35 09/12/14 (38)
- "stink up this forum" - well put, if too mildly for my tastes. - carcass93 10:47:16 09/12/14 (2)
- RE: "stink up this forum" - well put, if too mildly for my tastes. - Mercman 11:34:47 09/12/14 (1)
- Yeah... besides that one undeniable purpose, he serves another - providing "diversity". - carcass93 11:43:50 09/12/14 (0)
- RE: This seems easy - Storris 04:27:32 09/12/14 (34)
- "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - carcass93 10:44:00 09/12/14 (33)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 12:37:12 09/12/14 (32)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 13:02:55 09/12/14 (31)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 13:07:14 09/12/14 (30)
- You can go ahead and edit your posts, as posting to yourself isn't kosher...* - Chris Garrett 09:31:26 09/16/14 (0)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - AbeCollins 14:23:46 09/12/14 (28)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 15:39:40 09/12/14 (27)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Jaundiced Ear 17:25:02 09/12/14 (26)
- Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Tony Lauck 10:06:18 09/13/14 (8)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Jaundiced Ear 14:03:02 09/13/14 (4)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Tony Lauck 14:19:40 09/13/14 (3)
- "You have to read .... 4000+ posts" - or, he could assemble a reasonably resolving system, and listen. - carcass93 08:44:07 09/15/14 (0)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Jaundiced Ear 22:32:03 09/14/14 (1)
- RE: Redbook Proven to be not transparent - Tony Lauck 11:57:33 09/15/14 (0)
- Subjective objectivity - Storris 12:46:51 09/13/14 (2)
- RE: Subjective objectivity - Tony Lauck 13:31:09 09/13/14 (1)
- RE: Subjective objectivity - Storris 15:06:06 09/13/14 (0)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 01:03:47 09/13/14 (16)
- Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 14:09:19 09/13/14 (14)
- RE: Food for thought - Storris 21:46:59 09/14/14 (8)
- RE: Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 22:30:32 09/14/14 (7)
- RE: Food for thought - Storris 22:58:36 09/14/14 (6)
- RE: Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 23:06:56 09/14/14 (5)
- RE: Food for thought - Tony Lauck 12:37:33 09/15/14 (0)
- RE: Food for thought - Storris 01:33:46 09/15/14 (3)
- RE: Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 04:05:30 09/15/14 (2)
- RE: Food for thought - Storris 04:30:48 09/15/14 (1)
- RE: Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 05:04:01 09/15/14 (0)
- RE: Food for thought - Tony Lauck 17:30:00 09/13/14 (3)
- RE: Food for thought - Jaundiced Ear 22:40:30 09/14/14 (1)
- RE: Food for thought - Tony Lauck 05:21:15 09/15/14 (0)
- "Outrage" is interesting word. Do I feel outrage, reading that non-experiential crap? - carcass93 19:04:38 09/13/14 (0)
- RE: Food for thought - Storris 14:59:22 09/13/14 (0)
- RE: "goal is bit-perfect, high-res, analogue, output from the PC" - whose goal is that? - Storris 03:21:03 09/13/14 (0)