In Reply to: RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. posted by Tony Lauck on July 7, 2014 at 20:23:37:
"The goal was to prevent TV interference, or interference to other narrow band signals because of the use of obsolete receiver technology."
Not true as I understand it. The goal is to spread out the energy of energetic peaks to a wider band which will allow the manufacturers to utilize a loophole in the test method to attain compliance. The goals in setting test limit values had to do with preventing unwanted interference in RF receivers such as TV's but also in limiting malfunctioning of other types of equipment not intended as receivers such as pacemakers.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Ugly 20:36:56 07/07/14 (16)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Tony Lauck 21:02:05 07/07/14 (15)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Ugly 21:34:16 07/07/14 (14)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - fmak 22:42:22 07/07/14 (13)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Bob_C 13:32:06 07/08/14 (0)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Tony Lauck 09:30:04 07/08/14 (8)
- It is laughable for anyone - fmak 04:46:45 07/09/14 (7)
- RE: It is laughable for anyone - Tony Lauck 07:02:19 07/09/14 (6)
- Another - fmak 08:11:07 07/09/14 (5)
- RE: Another - Tony Lauck 09:05:43 07/09/14 (4)
- As - fmak 09:25:33 07/09/14 (3)
- RE: As - Tony Lauck 12:40:28 07/09/14 (2)
- I think - fmak 13:54:44 07/09/14 (1)
- RE: I think - Tony Lauck 16:10:09 07/09/14 (0)
- RE: Sound Quality Changes caused by Sata cables. - Ugly 00:18:23 07/08/14 (2)
- Some who regard audio as a serious hobby - fmak 01:12:04 07/08/14 (1)
- You will see from the post above - fmak 04:48:13 07/09/14 (0)