In Reply to: So, no facts posted by mbnx01 on April 20, 2014 at 12:06:15:
After reading the text linked below, would you still say that fmak's post launches "just an abusive ad hominem", or simply states a basic fact?
The question, of course, becomes whether it's audible in one's system with one's ears - but there's no doubt that, at least theoretically, dithering is not harmless to sound quality.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's what one finds using Google: - carcass93 15:45:36 04/20/14 (2)
- RE: Here's what one finds using Google: - Tony Lauck 09:08:54 04/21/14 (0)
- RE: Here's what one finds using Google:-To add - fmak 22:04:07 04/20/14 (0)