RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical).

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - carcass93 14:13:40 04/14/14 (57)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - SBGK 15:14:48 04/17/14 (3)

I'm glad you're of such a high opinion of the software you developed, but... - carcass93 08:48:55 04/18/14 (1)

RE: I'm glad you're of such a high opinion of the software you developed, but... - SBGK 10:42:49 04/18/14 (0)

Digital Edge??? - fmak 22:14:09 04/17/14 (0)

Corrections, after a little bit of investigation: - carcass93 08:53:12 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - fmak 22:10:25 04/14/14 (51)

You're wrong - Goober58 10:54:15 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Scrith 10:12:28 04/15/14 (19)

You are a USER of computer audio, correct? Don't remember you claiming being developer... - carcass93 12:37:49 04/15/14 (0)

on the side of the users - fmak 10:58:47 04/15/14 (16)

RE: on the side of the users - Scrith 14:22:38 04/15/14 (15)

In addition to what Tony said about compiler settings - .... - carcass93 08:41:37 04/16/14 (0)

because information like that is, generally, not particularly useful to software users - fmak 02:13:48 04/16/14 (1)

RE: because information like that is, generally, not particularly useful to software users - Tony Lauck 14:12:32 04/16/14 (0)

RE: on the side of the users - Tony Lauck 19:11:26 04/15/14 (11)

no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - fmak 00:49:51 04/16/14 (8)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Tony Lauck 11:17:34 04/16/14 (7)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Bob_C 13:30:24 04/17/14 (4)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Tony Lauck 13:51:00 04/17/14 (3)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Bob_C 14:09:14 04/17/14 (2)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Tony Lauck 17:18:48 04/17/14 (1)

RE: no evidence that the two versions should sound the same - Bob_C 17:27:17 04/17/14 (0)

This supports my argument that we will never get consistently good sound by tweaking software - fmak 05:58:26 04/17/14 (1)

Then why do you think the programmer can do it? - Goober58 08:44:28 04/17/14 (0)

RE: on the side of the users - Bob_C 20:17:42 04/15/14 (1)

RE: on the side of the users - Scrith 10:27:40 04/16/14 (0)

What's sad is people come hear to learn. - Goober58 10:57:30 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Tony Lauck 22:48:12 04/14/14 (29)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Bob_C 17:26:23 04/15/14 (9)

"then you shouldn't be using a computer, you should be using a purpose built transport." - fmak 05:57:23 04/16/14 (6)

RE: "then you shouldn't be using a computer, you should be using a purpose built transport." - Bob_C 09:01:20 04/16/14 (5)

No - fmak 09:14:12 04/16/14 (4)

RE: No - Bob_C 10:11:57 04/16/14 (3)

RE: No-Versions - fmak 06:00:46 04/17/14 (2)

RE: No-Versions - Bob_C 16:50:44 04/17/14 (0)

RE: No-Versions - Bob_C 08:54:20 04/17/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Tony Lauck 18:23:18 04/15/14 (1)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Bob_C 18:36:28 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Bob_C 12:21:37 04/15/14 (2)

Question for Bob - fmak 23:39:04 04/15/14 (1)

RE: Question for Bob - Bob_C 00:23:57 04/16/14 (0)

Nice post Tony. nt - Goober58 10:58:12 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - AbeCollins 09:02:40 04/15/14 (1)

Abe, see above and take the week off... - Chris Garrett 12:18:01 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Sprezza Tura 08:33:09 04/15/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - fmak 04:45:19 04/15/14 (11)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Goober58 10:47:51 04/15/14 (10)

ideal settings - fmak 11:00:26 04/15/14 (9)

"ideal" settings? Come on give me a break - Goober58 11:05:01 04/15/14 (8)

Since every audio player - fmak 11:31:05 04/15/14 (7)

That's why final/ideal settings are up to the end user not the programmer - Goober58 11:52:55 04/15/14 (6)

That's why final/ideal settings are up to the end user not the programmer - fmak 23:43:06 04/15/14 (5)

Please keep focus on what we are discussing - Goober58 00:12:40 04/16/14 (4)

focus on what you are asserting and not what I said - fmak 02:19:13 04/16/14 (3)

Engineering tools and doctors equipment are calibrated on a regular. - Goober58 11:12:38 04/16/14 (2)

I thought you wanted to stay focussed - fmak 11:15:38 04/16/14 (1)

If you are an engineer you wouldn't be disagreeing with me. - Goober58 11:22:19 04/16/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Bob_C 17:26:23 04/15/14 (9)

"then you shouldn't be using a computer, you should be using a purpose built transport." - fmak 05:57:23 04/16/14 (6)

RE: "then you shouldn't be using a computer, you should be using a purpose built transport." - Bob_C 09:01:20 04/16/14 (5)

No - fmak 09:14:12 04/16/14 (4)

RE: No - Bob_C 10:11:57 04/16/14 (3)

RE: No-Versions - fmak 06:00:46 04/17/14 (2)

RE: No-Versions - Bob_C 16:50:44 04/17/14 (0)

RE: No-Versions - Bob_C 08:54:20 04/17/14 (0)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Tony Lauck 18:23:18 04/15/14 (1)

RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Bob_C 18:36:28 04/15/14 (0)

Post a Message!