In Reply to: RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). posted by fmak on April 15, 2014 at 04:45:19:
"There is no reason when writing a program not to define settings correctly, cheap or otherwse.
It is pure slopiness and arrogance in the sense that the user is unlikely to know."
I'm not really sure what it is you are trying to say but this is how I take it -
There is no reason whatsoever not to program ideal settings as no matter how bad the results the user is unlikely to know.
Funny thing is - I mostly agree.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Revisiting buffer sizes (somewhat technical). - Goober58 10:47:51 04/15/14 (10)
- ideal settings - fmak 11:00:26 04/15/14 (9)
- "ideal" settings? Come on give me a break - Goober58 11:05:01 04/15/14 (8)
- Since every audio player - fmak 11:31:05 04/15/14 (7)
- That's why final/ideal settings are up to the end user not the programmer - Goober58 11:52:55 04/15/14 (6)
- That's why final/ideal settings are up to the end user not the programmer - fmak 23:43:06 04/15/14 (5)
- Please keep focus on what we are discussing - Goober58 00:12:40 04/16/14 (4)
- focus on what you are asserting and not what I said - fmak 02:19:13 04/16/14 (3)
- Engineering tools and doctors equipment are calibrated on a regular. - Goober58 11:12:38 04/16/14 (2)
- I thought you wanted to stay focussed - fmak 11:15:38 04/16/14 (1)
- If you are an engineer you wouldn't be disagreeing with me. - Goober58 11:22:19 04/16/14 (0)