In Reply to: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? posted by carcass93 on April 2, 2014 at 13:28:30:
Personally, I am looking for "beautiful sound" like what I hear at live acoustic concerts. When I hear reproduced sound that is quite close to what I hear at live concerts and provides similar musical enjoyment, I'm not going to consider it "mediocre". The problem with digital sound, at least until fairly recently, is that most of it wasn't even "mediocre" it was more like "disgusting". (Or going way back to the 1980's, the word might even have been "vile".)
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? - Tony Lauck 14:07:02 04/02/14 (7)
- RE: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? - Bob_C 15:44:48 04/02/14 (4)
- RE: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? - Dynobot 16:59:45 04/02/14 (3)
- RE: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? - Bob_C 16:53:25 04/03/14 (2)
- RE: "Beautiful Digital Sound" is highly subjective, isn't it? - Old Listener 17:08:42 04/03/14 (1)
- RE: LoL nt - Bob_C 17:14:58 04/03/14 (0)
- Here's beautiful - and certainly digital - sound, with equally beautiful video, for you. - carcass93 14:17:27 04/02/14 (1)
- RE: Here's beautiful - and certainly digital - sound, with equally beautiful video, for you. - Tony Lauck 14:55:25 04/02/14 (0)