In Reply to: RE: audiophool bluster-always posted by Tony Lauck on July 4, 2012 at 12:49:37:
Your 'arguments' are about 10 years behind.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 21:58:09 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 06:15:55 07/05/12 (1)
- Computaphool bluster? - fmak 06:30:18 07/05/12 (0)