In Reply to: RE: audiophool bluster-always posted by Dynobot on July 4, 2012 at 11:10:55:
As I remember it, he didn't want anything to do with unrippable Sony inspired formats, even though DSD64 has technical and sonic merits over PCM.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 11:39:36 07/04/12 (4)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 12:49:37 07/04/12 (3)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 21:58:09 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 06:15:55 07/05/12 (1)
- Computaphool bluster? - fmak 06:30:18 07/05/12 (0)