In Reply to: RE: audiophool bluster-always posted by Tony Lauck on July 4, 2012 at 10:12:26:
'I pay little attention to reports of audible differences unless these come with a fairly complete description of what was heard and how the listening tests were conducted'
That's fine, just don't belittle others' remarks because they do not fit your rubrick.
I, for one, can go to some length about your 'monitor type' setup in a small room, not having the benefit of early reflections etc. But this is not my role and I take your observations at face value, evaluating them in the light of my own experience. That's it.
There is no basis in fact to the statement that PC hardware does not affect SQ materially. The factors are well known in electronics and audio..
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 11:06:20 07/04/12 (7)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 12:04:13 07/04/12 (6)
- early reflections - fmak 12:55:55 07/04/12 (5)
- Thanks for the useless non-answer to my simple questions. nt - Tony Lauck 15:14:12 07/04/12 (4)
- Appropriate answers to wrong questions - fmak 22:00:07 07/04/12 (0)
- and you are somehow suprised ???? - bwb 20:34:43 07/04/12 (0)
- LOL and been there done that, wink wink - nt - AbeCollins 20:23:53 07/04/12 (1)
- Applephool always? - fmak 23:19:06 07/04/12 (0)