In Reply to: RE: audiophool bluster-always posted by fmak on July 4, 2012 at 08:41:03:
My distaste referred to DSD64 which has high frequency noise starting below 30 kHz. DSD128 has similar artifacts, but they are moved up the F-scale and are much easier to filter out during playback without degrading the music.
I pay little attention to reports of audible differences unless these come with a fairly complete description of what was heard and how the listening tests were conducted. My experience is that many people reporting differences are not careful experimenters and some are actively hostile toward conducting additional experiments that might isolate the cause of an effect that was heard. These reports do not rise very far above the level of "noise" and do not contribute knowledge to the community.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 10:12:26 07/04/12 (14)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Dynobot 11:10:55 07/04/12 (5)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 11:39:36 07/04/12 (4)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 12:49:37 07/04/12 (3)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 21:58:09 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 06:15:55 07/05/12 (1)
- Computaphool bluster? - fmak 06:30:18 07/05/12 (0)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - fmak 11:06:20 07/04/12 (7)
- RE: audiophool bluster-always - Tony Lauck 12:04:13 07/04/12 (6)
- early reflections - fmak 12:55:55 07/04/12 (5)
- Thanks for the useless non-answer to my simple questions. nt - Tony Lauck 15:14:12 07/04/12 (4)
- Appropriate answers to wrong questions - fmak 22:00:07 07/04/12 (0)
- and you are somehow suprised ???? - bwb 20:34:43 07/04/12 (0)
- LOL and been there done that, wink wink - nt - AbeCollins 20:23:53 07/04/12 (1)
- Applephool always? - fmak 23:19:06 07/04/12 (0)