About 2 weeks ago I learned that Synergistic Research had announced a new product; a Thunderbolt cable with their Active Shielding called Thunderbolt Active SE. I contacted Ted Denney at Synergistic and told him I was using a Promise Pegasus 4TB Thunderbolt drive for my music library. One week later, Ted sent me an advanced prototype cable for evaluation that will be the final production model. This was arranged through my Synergistic Research dealer.Current Thunderbolt cables use a Gennum transceiver at each end and copper cable in between. Synergistic Research adds active shielding with two additional connectors at one end. One is for the power supply called a Mini Power Coupler that is supplied with the cable. The other connector is for the Enigma Tuning Bullets that fine tune the sound of the cable. The cable comes with Grey and Silver bullets and an additional Black bullet is also available as an option. I preferred the sound of the Grey Bullet in my system.
As with other Synergistic Research Active Shield cables, a break-in period is necessary to obtain the best sonic results. Ted recommended about 100 hours for the Thunderbolt Active SE to open up. This merely requires that you leave the computer and drive on for about 4 days. I noticed a significant improvement in sound quality after several days of use.
One of the most striking sonic characteristics of the Thunderbolt Active SE is a drop in the noise floor of recorded music. There was a greater sense of immediacy and detail with this cable. Less grain and a greater ease to the sound was heard compared to the Apple Thunderbolt cable. Previous recordings that were somewhat small sounding were now exhibiting a wider and deeper soundstage. Better definition in the bass was also heard.
I reviewed what I had written recently about the Synergistic Tranquility Base, and found that I was documenting many of the previous findings I heard with the Base. This is not surprising given that similar voicing of the products was probably performed.
I decided that I would enlist the aid of my wife for double blind testing using HRx Reference Recordings Brasileiro Soul / Reinaldo Brahn 176.4/24. Given that the Promise Pegasus can handle two Thunderbolt cables for multiple drives, unmounting the drive and connecting a different cable made testing quite easy. Both my wife and I had no difficulty picking out the Synergistic cable from the Apple.
I have to admit that I entered this testing with a good deal of skepticism. I even used double blind listening trials; a first for me. The best compliment I can attribute to this cable is that I will not be returning the Synergistic Research Thunderbolt SE to my dealer. It’s just that good.
Cost: $800 for 2 meter cable
Additional music used in evaluation:
Lang Lang / Rachmaninoff: Piano Concerto 3 176.4/24
Mel Torme Swings Shubert Alley 192/24
Alison Krauss & Union Station-Live 176.4/24 (Ripped SACD DSD Recording)
The Smashing Pumpkins / Oceania 96/24
Peter Dijkstra / Netherland Chamber Choir / Bach Motets 192/24Early MacBook Pro 2.3GHz Quad Core i7, 16 GB RAM, OCZ Vertex 3 SSD for OS. OSX Lion using Direct Mode/Integer Beta Audirvana Plus 1.3.9.3. Wavelength Crimson HS Silver/Denominator.
Edits: 06/25/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 07:45:50 06/25/12 (81)
- I am conflicted - 13th Duke of Wymbourne 16:55:45 06/26/12 (1)
- RE: I am conflicted - Mercman 17:56:50 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Tony Lauck 10:18:23 06/25/12 (78)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 10:30:28 06/25/12 (77)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - fmak 11:34:07 06/25/12 (60)
- Maybe, but why then does it work? Don't give us the placebo effect crap. nt - Norm 11:07:54 06/26/12 (59)
- RE: Maybe, but why then does it work? - fmak 12:00:19 06/26/12 (58)
- "mythical" isn't applicable - Sordidman 13:02:57 06/26/12 (1)
- RE: "mythical" isn't applicable - fmak 00:39:44 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: Maybe, but why then does it work? - Mercman 12:24:37 06/26/12 (4)
- RE: Maybe, but why then does it work? - Tony Lauck 13:01:08 06/26/12 (0)
- Ever - fmak 12:46:54 06/26/12 (2)
- RE: Ever - Mercman 12:57:59 06/26/12 (1)
- If you invest thousands on audio - fmak 22:07:02 06/26/12 (0)
- Don't assume that mankind knows all the mysteries of nature. nt - Norm 12:02:56 06/26/12 (50)
- So, it's ok to mystify a resistor by calling it a bullet? - fmak 12:48:24 06/26/12 (49)
- When you get called, you resort to gobbledygook? nt - Norm 14:32:01 06/26/12 (48)
- Oh, - fmak 22:09:00 06/26/12 (1)
- No! - Norm 07:06:43 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: When you get called, you resort to gobbledygook? nt - Dawnrazor 15:19:18 06/26/12 (45)
- Have you - fmak 04:23:32 06/27/12 (44)
- As clear as mud - grounds for complaint - Ryelands 02:07:12 06/28/12 (7)
- RE: As clear as mud - grounds for complaint - fmak 02:14:35 06/28/12 (6)
- the master of evasion and non-answers accuses others of the same - bwb 08:00:20 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: As clear as mud - grounds for complaint - Dawnrazor 07:52:51 06/28/12 (0)
- A maturity I'd never suspected . . . - Ryelands 04:29:44 06/28/12 (3)
- RE: A maturity I'd never suspected . . . - Mercman 04:58:30 06/28/12 (2)
- RE: A maturity I'd never suspected . . . - Ryelands 05:14:08 06/28/12 (1)
- RE: A maturity I'd never suspected . . . - Mercman 06:36:30 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: Have you - Dawnrazor 21:43:43 06/27/12 (0)
- Do you? nt - Norm 07:08:14 06/27/12 (34)
- Fmak makes perfect sense. - Tony Lauck 08:54:03 06/27/12 (33)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - fmak 12:35:12 06/27/12 (3)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - Tony Lauck 15:36:34 06/27/12 (2)
- BL1 - fmak 22:01:43 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - fmak 21:53:28 06/27/12 (0)
- Good for you. But why should I necessarily value your opinions? - Norm 11:55:38 06/27/12 (8)
- RE: Good for you. But why should I necessarily value your opinions? - fmak 12:39:39 06/27/12 (5)
- They should only take them as my experiences. - Norm 13:56:35 06/27/12 (4)
- Good Science?. - fmak 21:59:07 06/27/12 (2)
- It is "good science" to just pronounce it? Where is your data? nt - Norm 17:59:36 06/29/12 (1)
- I should add that I still find the H-Cat gear provides the most holographic image I've heard. - Norm 18:03:36 06/29/12 (0)
- RE: They should only take them as my experiences. - Tony Lauck 14:37:55 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: Good for you. But why should I necessarily value your opinions? - Tony Lauck 12:28:04 06/27/12 (1)
- I totally agree. Perhaps we are talking past each other. If so, I apologize. nt - Norm 13:59:26 06/27/12 (0)
- One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Sordidman 09:39:27 06/27/12 (15)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Tony Lauck 10:15:03 06/27/12 (10)
- That's an example of myopic view, if there was one! - carcass93 11:48:43 06/27/12 (3)
- RE: That's an example of myopic view, if there was one! - Tony Lauck 12:32:53 06/27/12 (2)
- I'm sorry - you don't get it. Taste in music is NOT IMPORTANT. - carcass93 12:49:14 06/27/12 (1)
- RE: I'm sorry - you don't get it. Taste in music is NOT IMPORTANT. - Tony Lauck 13:19:25 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Sordidman 10:33:54 06/27/12 (3)
- This is not a science so there is no need for an arbiter, nor is there in science. The arbiter is the buyer. * - Norm 12:03:29 06/27/12 (1)
- Yes of course -t - Sordidman 15:54:09 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Tony Lauck 11:12:32 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Mercman 10:20:26 06/27/12 (1)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Tony Lauck 10:53:27 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Mercman 10:06:57 06/27/12 (3)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Tony Lauck 10:38:06 06/27/12 (2)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Mercman 13:49:04 06/27/12 (1)
- RE: One cannot adequately, objectively, explain... - Tony Lauck 14:53:45 06/27/12 (0)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - Mercman 09:20:21 06/27/12 (3)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - Tony Lauck 09:34:38 06/27/12 (2)
- Naw, - there isn't deception, only learning for the senses - Sordidman 09:24:57 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: Fmak makes perfect sense. - theob 03:54:08 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Tony Lauck 10:47:17 06/25/12 (15)
- Validity is not yours alone to judge. nt - Norm 11:11:12 06/26/12 (1)
- RE: Validity is not yours alone to judge. nt - Tony Lauck 11:26:26 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 10:48:19 06/25/12 (12)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Tony Lauck 10:53:44 06/25/12 (11)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - fmak 11:36:45 06/25/12 (5)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Tony Lauck 15:49:15 06/25/12 (2)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - fmak 22:18:44 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - AbeCollins 17:17:15 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 11:44:41 06/25/12 (1)
- Extreme Bahaviour? - fmak 22:03:20 06/25/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 11:21:18 06/25/12 (4)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Tony Lauck 11:30:29 06/25/12 (3)
- If - fmak 03:44:43 06/26/12 (0)
- RE: Synergistic Research Thunderbolt Active SE Cable - Mercman 11:34:48 06/25/12 (1)
- I know that for my best vinyl listening the music server has to be off. But - Norm 11:17:56 06/26/12 (0)