Topic - Why are many chip manufacturers, such as Sabre, forcing upsampling on everything to 192/24 including 96/24 HD? - Norm 07:46:22 05/11/12 (19)

• RE: Why are many chip manufacturers, such as Sabre, forcing upsampling on everything to 192/24 including 96/24 HD? - Tony Lauck 09:33:16 05/12/12 (8)
• RE: Why are many chip manufacturers, such as Sabre, forcing upsampling on everything to 192/24 including 96/24 HD? - Dynobot 11:58:47 05/12/12 (7)
• RE: Why are many chip manufacturers, such as Sabre, forcing upsampling on everything to 192/24 including 96/24 HD? - Tony Lauck 12:15:17 05/12/12 (6)
• What do you do with the partial bit in non-integer upsampling? nt - Norm 06:54:02 05/21/12 (5)
• There are no partial bits. - Tony Lauck 08:08:50 05/21/12 (4)
• And 48 and 176/24? nt - Norm 09:01:42 05/23/12 (3)
• Yes - Tony Lauck 09:15:57 05/23/12 (2)
• How do you get 176 to 192 with integers? Or 44.1 to 192? nt - Norm 09:37:29 05/23/12 (1)
• I explained it in an earlier post. - Tony Lauck 12:50:46 05/23/12 (0)
• Because more is always better. See USB3 thread. - Tromatic 10:17:21 05/11/12 (1)
• But - Dynobot 10:28:35 05/11/12 (0)
• RE: Why are many chip manufacturers, such as Sabre, forcing upsampling on everything to 192/24 including 96/24 HD? - audioengr 09:50:01 05/11/12 (6)
• Then how about getting rid of the analog filtering? Nt - Frihed89 09:00:45 05/12/12 (3)
• RE: Then how about getting rid of the analog filtering? Nt - audioengr 11:14:32 05/12/12 (2)
• RE: Then how about getting rid of the analog filtering? Nt - Frihed89 23:26:51 05/12/12 (0)
• RE: Then how about getting rid of the analog filtering? Nt - Tony Lauck 12:39:04 05/12/12 (0)
• You - fmak 17:18:32 05/11/12 (1)
• Upsampling - audioengr 11:17:09 05/12/12 (0)
• 32-bit/1.4MHz up sampling using Wadia's proprietary DigiMaster algorithm - Dynobot 07:50:04 05/11/12 (0)