In Reply to: RE: You are NOT alone, but impatience and posted by Ryelands on May 5, 2012 at 01:50:41:
''I can offer assurances based on experience, not speculation, that a system using an industrial-quality CPU c/w a good linear power supply and configured as you suggest benefits greatly from the measures Serge and others describe under the general heading of "OS Slimming".''
Nobody disputes this, but you cannot convince using 'evidence' unless you have experience of a variety high end plyback systems.
The issue is:
How far does one go with disabling hundreds of tabs and for what valid reason? What is software jitter? The assertions and erroneous 'jitter' measurements that are contained in the cics papers certainly do not explain the change of sound quality for the better, which is confined to experiences with one player with more than 39 versions written for 4 or more different operating characteristics of cpus.
A simple demonstration of what I and others have said, is simply that KS and Exclsuive Mode offer different sound qualities from ASIO. The player buffer size also affects sound quality. With such variables. how can inmates claim that cMP and cPlay offer optimisation of playback from a PC system? Also, such 'optimisations via minimisations' for best SQ is directly contradicted by MAC users with 'power' computers, high end audio replay equipment, and who have access to a wide range of players designed for audio.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You are NOT alone, but impatience and - fmak 06:25:10 05/05/12 (27)
- RE: You are NOT alone, but impatience and - Dawnrazor 09:12:35 05/05/12 (26)
- I dont think so. - fmak 10:16:28 05/05/12 (25)
- RE: I dont think so. - Dawnrazor 11:13:37 05/05/12 (24)
- Afterwards we discovered faith; it's all you need - fmak 20:59:08 05/05/12 (23)
- Actually Fred ANOTHER thing - Dawnrazor 22:50:00 05/05/12 (22)
- RE: Actually Fred ANOTHER thing -Why - fmak 22:55:43 05/05/12 (21)
- LOL. Its a BAND Fred - Dawnrazor 23:08:32 05/05/12 (20)
- Who has been the noisy party? - fmak 00:40:42 05/06/12 (19)
- RE: Who has been the noisy party? - Dawnrazor 01:31:44 05/06/12 (18)
- RE: Who has been the noisy party? - Tony Lauck 08:30:55 05/06/12 (0)
- RE: Who has been the noisy party? - Les C 03:54:01 05/06/12 (16)
- Congrats!! Welcome to cmp^2 world...slimmed - theob 03:59:33 05/06/12 (15)
- If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Tony Lauck 08:44:35 05/06/12 (12)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - theob 09:37:17 05/06/12 (2)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Tony Lauck 10:05:42 05/06/12 (1)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dawnrazor 10:19:44 05/06/12 (0)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dynobot 09:12:14 05/06/12 (8)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Tony Lauck 09:35:53 05/06/12 (5)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dynobot 10:02:11 05/06/12 (4)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - phofman 07:38:14 05/07/12 (3)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dynobot 11:35:14 05/07/12 (2)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - phofman 14:29:52 05/07/12 (1)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dynobot 15:18:51 05/07/12 (0)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dawnrazor 09:23:24 05/06/12 (1)
- RE: If you want a real goal to work for: 1kB of loaded code. - Dynobot 09:54:07 05/06/12 (0)
- RE: Congrats!! Welcome to cmp^2 world...slimmed - Les C 06:02:58 05/06/12 (1)
- RE: Congrats!! Welcome to cmp^2 world...slimmed - theob 07:29:44 05/06/12 (0)