Computer Audio Asylum Music servers and other computer based digital audio technologies. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Review DACs with transports? posted by fmak on April 6, 2012 at 10:10:07:
Over there you either agree with Chris or else.
Same for Jim at Jriver and Lavry at his site.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - Newbie questions - HiFiOd 14:14:44 04/04/12 (104)
- RE: Newbie questions - Wesley Miaw 13:13:16 04/07/12 (2)
- Thank you! (nt) - HiFiOd 16:46:40 04/07/12 (0)
- Formats - audioengr 16:32:20 04/07/12 (0)
- There are other schools of thought - Frihed89 15:41:55 04/05/12 (12)
- Yes and no - audioengr 16:20:01 04/06/12 (0)
- No filtering is just a case of unengineered bad filtering - Tony Lauck 08:15:56 04/06/12 (10)
- Classically educated - fmak 00:39:28 04/07/12 (9)
- RE: Classically educated - rick_m 09:10:49 04/07/12 (1)
- RE: Classically educated - fmak 10:58:01 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - Dynobot 08:39:51 04/07/12 (4)
- RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - audioengr 10:37:12 04/07/12 (3)
- RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - Dynobot 17:35:39 04/07/12 (1)
- RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - audioengr 21:16:21 04/07/12 (0)
- Engineering Career - fmak 10:49:16 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: Classically educated - Tony Lauck 06:13:39 04/07/12 (1)
- Khan Academy - audioengr 10:40:08 04/07/12 (0)
- a different opinion - Joe Murphy Jr 13:40:17 04/05/12 (3)
- RE: a different opinion - fmak 00:40:41 04/07/12 (0)
- Especially - audioengr 16:22:14 04/06/12 (1)
- RE: Especially - fmak 00:41:47 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: Newbie questions - soundchekk 00:23:55 04/05/12 (55)
- in your dreams - audioengr 12:55:48 04/05/12 (0)
- Your post smacks of certainty in an uncertain world - Sordidman 10:21:57 04/05/12 (0)
- Got any Recs for a "great reclocker in between your system and DAC"?.....nt - Cut-Throat 05:25:47 04/05/12 (0)
- RE: Newbie questions - soundchekk 03:29:30 04/05/12 (51)
- DAC jitter rejection - audioengr 13:05:39 04/05/12 (14)
- "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - dRRD 03:43:23 04/06/12 (9)
- RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - fmak 03:23:34 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - audioengr 11:36:59 04/06/12 (7)
- RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - fmak 03:20:26 04/07/12 (6)
- jitter measurements - audioengr 09:56:35 04/07/12 (5)
- RE: jitter measurements - rick_m 08:38:48 04/08/12 (2)
- RE: jitter measurements - audioengr 18:40:48 04/08/12 (1)
- Thanks! - rick_m 20:19:18 04/08/12 (0)
- RE: jitter measurements-You - fmak 00:04:10 04/08/12 (1)
- RE: jitter measurements-You - audioengr 18:38:15 04/08/12 (0)
- RE: DAC jitter rejection - soundchekk 01:57:57 04/06/12 (3)
- RE: DAC jitter rejection - Recorder 10:59:25 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: DAC jitter rejection - audioengr 10:49:44 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: DAC jitter rejection - Mercman 04:24:25 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Newbie questions - rick_m 09:36:51 04/05/12 (0)
- Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Tony Lauck 09:23:11 04/05/12 (34)
- RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - audioengr 13:14:28 04/05/12 (28)
- RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Tony Lauck 13:48:01 04/05/12 (27)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 06:29:03 04/06/12 (25)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Tony Lauck 06:59:25 04/06/12 (23)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 07:48:16 04/06/12 (22)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 08:07:08 04/06/12 (21)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 09:47:11 04/06/12 (6)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:51:05 04/06/12 (5)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?And the - fmak 11:22:22 04/06/12 (1)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?And the - Mercman 11:27:18 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 09:56:28 04/06/12 (2)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:58:10 04/06/12 (1)
- Seriously - Dynobot 10:10:46 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 09:15:12 04/06/12 (13)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:48:26 04/06/12 (12)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Tony Lauck 12:17:04 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 10:10:07 04/06/12 (10)
- Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - Dynobot 10:19:56 04/06/12 (1)
- RE: Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - fmak 11:24:06 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 10:12:31 04/06/12 (7)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation= - fmak 11:25:33 04/06/12 (6)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation= - Mercman 15:29:41 04/06/12 (5)
- Let's call the whole thing off. - Tony Lauck 07:03:58 04/07/12 (1)
- Wow real music - Dynobot 17:59:16 04/10/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - fmak 21:58:14 04/06/12 (2)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - Mercman 05:18:05 04/07/12 (1)
- RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - fmak 06:11:16 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 06:48:05 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - soundchekk 05:44:41 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Dynobot 09:40:37 04/05/12 (4)
- All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Tony Lauck 10:28:26 04/05/12 (3)
- RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Dynobot 11:44:26 04/05/12 (2)
- RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Tony Lauck 12:09:52 04/05/12 (1)
- Ahhhhh - Dynobot 12:20:02 04/05/12 (0)
- Try these - audioengr 16:24:06 04/04/12 (27)
- RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 12:02:00 04/06/12 (7)
- RE: Try these - erin 02:59:56 04/10/12 (5)
- RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 10:31:10 04/10/12 (4)
- RE: Try these - erin 16:04:40 04/10/12 (2)
- RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 17:49:11 04/10/12 (1)
- RE: Try these - erin 18:00:11 04/10/12 (0)
- Measurements? - audioengr 13:19:32 04/10/12 (0)
- volume - audioengr 13:10:13 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Try these - John V 14:37:29 04/05/12 (1)
- RE: Try these - audioengr 10:53:35 04/06/12 (0)
- RE: Try these - HiFiOd 21:09:42 04/04/12 (0)
- 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Dynobot 17:19:21 04/04/12 (15)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 12:59:01 04/07/12 (12)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 13:32:30 04/07/12 (4)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 14:07:14 04/07/12 (3)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 00:03:41 04/08/12 (2)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - rick_m 16:51:41 04/08/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 05:23:48 04/08/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 13:06:25 04/07/12 (6)
- not immune because of intrinsic jitter - Dynobot 04:38:16 04/11/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 13:34:18 04/07/12 (4)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 16:20:22 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 14:04:32 04/07/12 (2)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 16:27:47 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 14:09:04 04/07/12 (0)
- RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 21:45:55 04/04/12 (1)
- replace the entire DAC with one with a lower jitter interface. = best way to go..nt - Dynobot 06:09:03 04/05/12 (0)
Follow Ups
- Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - Dynobot 10:19:56 04/06/12 (1)
- RE: Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - fmak 11:24:06 04/06/12 (0)