RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box...

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Newbie questions - HiFiOd 14:14:44 04/04/12 (104)

RE: Newbie questions - Wesley Miaw 13:13:16 04/07/12 (2)

Thank you! (nt) - HiFiOd 16:46:40 04/07/12 (0)

Formats - audioengr 16:32:20 04/07/12 (0)

There are other schools of thought - Frihed89 15:41:55 04/05/12 (12)

Yes and no - audioengr 16:20:01 04/06/12 (0)

No filtering is just a case of unengineered bad filtering - Tony Lauck 08:15:56 04/06/12 (10)

Classically educated - fmak 00:39:28 04/07/12 (9)

RE: Classically educated - rick_m 09:10:49 04/07/12 (1)

RE: Classically educated - fmak 10:58:01 04/07/12 (0)

RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - Dynobot 08:39:51 04/07/12 (4)

RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - audioengr 10:37:12 04/07/12 (3)

RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - Dynobot 17:35:39 04/07/12 (1)

RE: Classically educated vs. Audio Forum Educated - audioengr 21:16:21 04/07/12 (0)

Engineering Career - fmak 10:49:16 04/07/12 (0)

RE: Classically educated - Tony Lauck 06:13:39 04/07/12 (1)

Khan Academy - audioengr 10:40:08 04/07/12 (0)

a different opinion - Joe Murphy Jr 13:40:17 04/05/12 (3)

RE: a different opinion - fmak 00:40:41 04/07/12 (0)

Especially - audioengr 16:22:14 04/06/12 (1)

RE: Especially - fmak 00:41:47 04/07/12 (0)

RE: Newbie questions - soundchekk 00:23:55 04/05/12 (55)

in your dreams - audioengr 12:55:48 04/05/12 (0)

Your post smacks of certainty in an uncertain world - Sordidman 10:21:57 04/05/12 (0)

Got any Recs for a "great reclocker in between your system and DAC"?.....nt - Cut-Throat 05:25:47 04/05/12 (0)

RE: Newbie questions - soundchekk 03:29:30 04/05/12 (51)

DAC jitter rejection - audioengr 13:05:39 04/05/12 (14)

"If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - dRRD 03:43:23 04/06/12 (9)

RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - fmak 03:23:34 04/07/12 (0)

RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - audioengr 11:36:59 04/06/12 (7)

RE: "If you were an engineer" you'd back it up with measurements nt. - fmak 03:20:26 04/07/12 (6)

jitter measurements - audioengr 09:56:35 04/07/12 (5)

RE: jitter measurements - rick_m 08:38:48 04/08/12 (2)

RE: jitter measurements - audioengr 18:40:48 04/08/12 (1)

Thanks! - rick_m 20:19:18 04/08/12 (0)

RE: jitter measurements-You - fmak 00:04:10 04/08/12 (1)

RE: jitter measurements-You - audioengr 18:38:15 04/08/12 (0)

RE: DAC jitter rejection - soundchekk 01:57:57 04/06/12 (3)

RE: DAC jitter rejection - Recorder 10:59:25 04/06/12 (0)

RE: DAC jitter rejection - audioengr 10:49:44 04/06/12 (0)

RE: DAC jitter rejection - Mercman 04:24:25 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Newbie questions - rick_m 09:36:51 04/05/12 (0)

Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Tony Lauck 09:23:11 04/05/12 (34)

RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - audioengr 13:14:28 04/05/12 (28)

RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Tony Lauck 13:48:01 04/05/12 (27)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 06:29:03 04/06/12 (25)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Tony Lauck 06:59:25 04/06/12 (23)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 07:48:16 04/06/12 (22)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 08:07:08 04/06/12 (21)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 09:47:11 04/06/12 (6)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:51:05 04/06/12 (5)

RE: Review DACs with transports?And the - fmak 11:22:22 04/06/12 (1)

RE: Review DACs with transports?And the - Mercman 11:27:18 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 09:56:28 04/06/12 (2)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:58:10 04/06/12 (1)

Seriously - Dynobot 10:10:46 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 09:15:12 04/06/12 (13)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 09:48:26 04/06/12 (12)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Tony Lauck 12:17:04 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - fmak 10:10:07 04/06/12 (10)

Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - Dynobot 10:19:56 04/06/12 (1)

RE: Computer Audiophile? Light reading and sometimes amusing....Not Really. - fmak 11:24:06 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Mercman 10:12:31 04/06/12 (7)

RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation= - fmak 11:25:33 04/06/12 (6)

RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation= - Mercman 15:29:41 04/06/12 (5)

Let's call the whole thing off. - Tony Lauck 07:03:58 04/07/12 (1)

Wow real music - Dynobot 17:59:16 04/10/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - fmak 21:58:14 04/06/12 (2)

RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - Mercman 05:18:05 04/07/12 (1)

RE: Review DACs with transports?Observation=Forum? - fmak 06:11:16 04/07/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with transports? - Dynobot 06:48:05 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - soundchekk 05:44:41 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Review DACs with bad transports, not good transports. - Dynobot 09:40:37 04/05/12 (4)

All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Tony Lauck 10:28:26 04/05/12 (3)

RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Dynobot 11:44:26 04/05/12 (2)

RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Tony Lauck 12:09:52 04/05/12 (1)

Ahhhhh - Dynobot 12:20:02 04/05/12 (0)

Try these - audioengr 16:24:06 04/04/12 (27)

RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 12:02:00 04/06/12 (7)

RE: Try these - erin 02:59:56 04/10/12 (5)

RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 10:31:10 04/10/12 (4)

RE: Try these - erin 16:04:40 04/10/12 (2)

RE: Try these - Tony Lauck 17:49:11 04/10/12 (1)

RE: Try these - erin 18:00:11 04/10/12 (0)

Measurements? - audioengr 13:19:32 04/10/12 (0)

volume - audioengr 13:10:13 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Try these - John V 14:37:29 04/05/12 (1)

RE: Try these - audioengr 10:53:35 04/06/12 (0)

RE: Try these - HiFiOd 21:09:42 04/04/12 (0)

1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Dynobot 17:19:21 04/04/12 (15)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 12:59:01 04/07/12 (12)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 13:32:30 04/07/12 (4)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 14:07:14 04/07/12 (3)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 00:03:41 04/08/12 (2)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - rick_m 16:51:41 04/08/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 05:23:48 04/08/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 13:06:25 04/07/12 (6)

not immune because of intrinsic jitter - Dynobot 04:38:16 04/11/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 13:34:18 04/07/12 (4)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 16:20:22 04/07/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - phofman 14:04:32 04/07/12 (2)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 16:27:47 04/07/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - Wesley Miaw 14:09:04 04/07/12 (0)

RE: 1) without a doubt, #1 is digital source jitter - audioengr 21:45:55 04/04/12 (1)

replace the entire DAC with one with a lower jitter interface. = best way to go..nt - Dynobot 06:09:03 04/05/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Dynobot 11:44:26 04/05/12 (2)

RE: All you would need would be a cardboard box... - Tony Lauck 12:09:52 04/05/12 (1)

Ahhhhh - Dynobot 12:20:02 04/05/12 (0)

Post a Message!