In Reply to: RE: Interesting analogy, but... posted by phofman on March 25, 2012 at 00:23:44:
"The computer audio was intentionally designed this way not to give CPU the last word in data transfer. The engineers would have had to be completely dumb to allow that."
Back in the 1960's when transistors were very expensive and data rates were very slow some engineers designed a multiline teletype interface for a minicomputer to work just like you suggest. This worked OK until a salesman tried to sell it to a PTT (Post, Telgraph and Telephone) authority down under. (AU or NZ, I don't recall which.) It turns out that they required all equipment to meet a tight jitter specification. (Tight because it required jitter in the microsecond region for telegraph lines running at 50 bits per second or slower.) As it turns out the software could not meet this number when it was handling a large number of lines and the product was too expensive if the computer was restricted to a small number of lines. So, you could say the engineers were dumb. But I knew them and they weren't completely dumb. They designed a new version that provided a bit buffer and solved the jitter problem.
One might wonder why a 50 bit per second telegraph interface needs jitter in the microsecond region. It has to do with telegraph distortion which starts at the transmitter, goes through the wires (large L, C and R) and ends up at the receiver which has to sort out the mess. Tight specifications reduced the chance a marginal telegraph line might garble the signal. (The lines would blow around in the wind and the dialectric would vary according to the weather, hence inconsistent distortion.)
Not much has really changed in over 40 years. Transistors cost much less, and time is now measured in units of picoseconds instead of microseconds. Bits weren't just bits back then and they aren't just bits today. (Time resolution in the analog domain is much smaller than time resolution in the digital domain according to the signal to noise ratio.)
BTW, telegraph distortion was very old hat in the 1960's.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- a bit of ancient digital history... - Tony Lauck 10:42:47 03/25/12 (24)
- RE: a bit of ancient digital history... - phofman 11:26:14 03/25/12 (23)
- RE: a bit of ancient digital history... - Dynobot 06:24:03 03/26/12 (22)
- RE: a bit of ancient digital history... - phofman 14:02:55 03/26/12 (18)
- No results needed - Dynobot 18:57:43 03/26/12 (17)
- RE: No results needed - phofman 00:27:14 03/27/12 (16)
- DBT - Dynobot 06:23:30 03/27/12 (15)
- RE: DBT - phofman 06:38:46 03/27/12 (14)
- HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Dynobot 06:46:32 03/27/12 (13)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - phofman 07:00:41 03/27/12 (12)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Tony Lauck 09:43:03 03/27/12 (9)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - phofman 10:36:53 03/27/12 (7)
- Hello Little Circle - Dynobot 11:16:01 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Tony Lauck 10:58:32 03/27/12 (5)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - phofman 13:20:36 03/27/12 (1)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Tony Lauck 13:39:15 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Dynobot 11:06:27 03/27/12 (2)
- Quantum mechanics... - Old Listener 12:13:21 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: HAhahahahaha I WIN!!!! - Tony Lauck 12:03:37 03/27/12 (0)
- Proving Perception - Dynobot 09:52:35 03/27/12 (0)
- if people can REALLY distinguish between RT kernel - Dynobot 07:09:46 03/27/12 (1)
- RE: if people can REALLY distinguish between RT kernel - phofman 07:14:00 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: a bit of ancient digital history... - Scrith 10:39:43 03/26/12 (2)
- DAC IS DEPENDENT ON THE TIMING OF INCOMING DATA. - Dynobot 10:31:37 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: a bit of ancient digital history... - Dynobot 19:01:51 03/26/12 (0)