In Reply to: RE: Thanks for the review... posted by Mercman on March 24, 2012 at 16:11:32:
"The Blind Test was pretty much a joke. When the Base is on, it is so obvious that you would need to have a hearing impediment not to be able to pick it out."
Have you done any double blind tests? I ask this not to doubt that you hear something, but rather because of your remark. It's been my personal experience that differences that "obviously" require a "hearing test" often become inaudible as soon as one partakes of a blind test. I remember some blind tests conducted by Brad Meyer in which everything sounded the same and as the test continued everything started to sound like s****.
As to others hearing the same thing, this is what one would expect from guests in one's home. I've equivocated on more than one occasion during an audio demonstration when I was a guest. There are at least two good psychological reasons for this. People avoid conflict. People also are unwilling to admit that they aren't hearing something that others are reporting.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Tony Lauck 19:10:22 03/24/12 (26)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Archimago 15:11:40 03/25/12 (7)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Mercman 15:52:28 03/25/12 (6)
- Absolutely true: for the naysayer with his agendae - Sordidman 09:23:22 03/26/12 (0)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - fmak 22:09:03 03/25/12 (4)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Mercman 12:25:39 03/26/12 (0)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Tony Lauck 08:37:03 03/26/12 (2)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Mercman 12:14:51 03/26/12 (1)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Tony Lauck 13:41:22 03/26/12 (0)
- RE: Obvious differences, blind tests and white lies - Bob_C 21:10:49 03/24/12 (0)
- Blind tests are an invalid measure of sound quality. nt - Norm 20:29:12 03/24/12 (16)
- Blind tests are an education. - Tony Lauck 13:56:51 03/25/12 (3)
- Double Blind tests are an amusement. - Norm 18:00:28 03/25/12 (1)
- RE: Double Blind tests are an amusement. - Tony Lauck 18:22:42 03/25/12 (0)
- RE: Blind tests are an education. - Mercman 14:07:19 03/25/12 (0)
- BS --) RE: Blind tests are an invalid measure of sound quality. nt - Archimago 22:48:03 03/24/12 (11)
- "Blind tests are the highest level of evidence..." - no, they are not. - carcass93 09:23:26 03/26/12 (0)
- Many think the measure is invalid. Certainly, I do and would pay no attention to it results. - Norm 13:35:24 03/25/12 (9)
- Sorry... Disagree... RE: Many think the measure is invalid... - Archimago 14:51:26 03/25/12 (8)
- Isomorphic mean related to or characteristic of. - Norm 17:54:58 03/25/12 (7)
- RE: Isomorphic mean related to or characteristic of. - Archimago 21:50:45 03/25/12 (6)
- If you read what I said, I am talking about the double blind tests advocated and used by some psychologists. - Norm 11:23:14 03/27/12 (0)
- Norm is 100% right when it comes to the Null hypothesis - Tony Lauck 08:49:03 03/26/12 (4)
- RE: Norm is 100% right when it comes to the Null hypothesis - Archimago 17:27:37 03/26/12 (2)
- RE: Norm is 100% right when it comes to the Null hypothesis - Tony Lauck 06:27:37 03/27/12 (1)
- RE: Norm is 100% right when it comes to the Null hypothesis - Archimago 19:04:52 03/27/12 (0)
- Null? - fmak 09:13:11 03/26/12 (0)