RE: Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable"

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - samoore 20:54:24 01/07/12 (98)

TAS finally gets an aspect of audio right? Really? - spindrifter 22:20:40 01/20/12 (4)

RE: TAS finally gets an aspect of audio right? Really? - Tony Lauck 08:15:39 01/21/12 (3)

An AA expert responds - spindrifter 13:53:34 01/21/12 (2)

RE: An AA expert responds - Tony Lauck 14:10:44 01/21/12 (1)

OK, let's assume I'm an imbecile (in the digital playback sense) - spindrifter 21:40:16 01/21/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - soundchekk 23:56:02 01/11/12 (13)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Adriel 23:53:42 01/13/12 (7)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - soundchekk 01:09:29 01/14/12 (6)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Tony Lauck 07:46:08 01/14/12 (5)

Since USB was designed to transfer data, so you care other than for music? - Norm 15:26:44 01/15/12 (4)

RE: Since USB was designed to transfer data, so you care other than for music? - Tony Lauck 17:29:14 01/15/12 (3)

You know full-well that music is different as timing is important. - Norm 06:07:19 01/16/12 (2)

RE: You know full-well that music is different as timing is important. - Tony Lauck 07:59:14 01/16/12 (1)

Everything you said is what I said. - Norm 20:11:20 01/16/12 (0)

How do you do that? - samoore 08:36:54 01/12/12 (3)

RE: How do you do that? - soundchekk 10:34:55 01/12/12 (2)

Wow! - samoore 18:24:14 01/13/12 (1)

RE: Wow! - Dawnrazor 02:31:29 01/14/12 (0)

Seems.. - fmak 01:15:50 01/12/12 (0)

deja vu all over again :-) - Archimago 17:55:22 01/11/12 (18)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Tony Lauck 07:52:18 01/12/12 (1)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Bob_C 13:04:18 01/12/12 (0)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Dawnrazor 22:29:50 01/11/12 (15)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Archimago 23:28:17 01/12/12 (3)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Dawnrazor 08:02:02 01/13/12 (2)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Tony Lauck 12:17:59 01/13/12 (1)

RE: deja vu all over again :-) - Dawnrazor 02:20:33 01/14/12 (0)

+1 the world is a different place with a Sharp boombox -t - Sordidman 14:37:15 01/12/12 (10)

RE: +1 the world is a different place with a Sharp boombox -t - Archimago 23:29:22 01/12/12 (9)

If you don't listen, you'll never be able to hear -t - Sordidman 08:48:25 01/13/12 (8)

If you imagine you hear... Do you really hear? -nt - Archimago 09:18:50 01/17/12 (7)

Yes, absolutely! - riboge 12:43:23 01/17/12 (2)

RE: Yes, absolutely! - Archimago 13:56:32 01/17/12 (1)

And that's where you are most incorrect. They are not - Sordidman 14:09:48 01/17/12 (0)

If you are not God, will you know what people imagine? -nt - Sordidman 12:11:10 01/17/12 (3)

I'm God, nor do I care to know... - Archimago 13:46:30 01/17/12 (2)

Since you're God, I'm sure you now know that I'm not imagining - Sordidman 14:12:57 01/17/12 (1)

Woops... I'm NOT God. - Archimago 14:47:53 01/17/12 (0)

More evidence that they are basically clueless about digital audio - Scrith 14:43:18 01/11/12 (1)

Poor little Chihuahua, did all of your teeth fall out? -t - Sordidman 15:10:00 01/11/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - AbeCollins 20:30:42 01/08/12 (12)

Yeah... I often had that thought as well re: FLAC playback -t - Sordidman 17:13:27 01/10/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - PeterZ 10:27:55 01/09/12 (10)

Yes...the difference should be measurable - Scrith 17:40:24 01/11/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Dawnrazor 21:06:01 01/09/12 (2)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Tony Lauck 11:06:55 01/11/12 (1)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - AbeCollins 10:41:02 01/12/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Bromo33333 20:11:28 01/09/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - AbeCollins 11:43:57 01/09/12 (4)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Tony Lauck 14:21:20 01/09/12 (3)

Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable" - AbeCollins 17:08:41 01/09/12 (2)

RE: Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable" - PeterZ 06:58:08 01/10/12 (1)

RE: Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable" - Tony Lauck 10:40:18 01/11/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - niws 19:27:13 01/08/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - audioengr 10:31:58 01/08/12 (23)

How is Empirical Audio still in business?!? - Scrith 10:56:51 01/12/12 (2)

TROLL - audioengr 16:09:12 01/12/12 (1)

SALESMAN - Scrith 12:37:06 01/21/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - ThomasPf 20:15:08 01/11/12 (11)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - audioengr 10:19:24 01/12/12 (10)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - ThomasPf 10:37:29 01/12/12 (9)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - audioengr 16:11:58 01/12/12 (1)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - ThomasPf 12:19:04 01/13/12 (0)

Perfect is the enemy of good - Tony Lauck 11:56:21 01/12/12 (6)

Actually - fmak 22:24:55 01/13/12 (4)

RE: Actually - Tony Lauck 06:30:55 01/14/12 (3)

RE: Actually - fmak 06:52:32 01/14/12 (2)

RE: Actually - Tony Lauck 07:28:57 01/14/12 (1)

RE: Actually-Why? - fmak 07:51:18 01/14/12 (0)

RE: Perfect is the enemy of good - Bob_C 19:15:22 01/12/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Jwm 15:18:05 01/11/12 (1)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Tony Lauck 17:34:44 01/11/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Thorsten 12:56:35 01/08/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Chris_P 11:58:00 01/08/12 (4)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - audioengr 16:11:44 01/08/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Dawnrazor 13:07:08 01/08/12 (2)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - aljordan 07:28:17 01/12/12 (1)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Dawnrazor 03:12:53 01/14/12 (0)

Years ago these theories used to be interesting - Dynobot 06:23:10 01/08/12 (1)

Interesting response - mr.bear 08:55:38 01/09/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Thorsten 02:49:11 01/08/12 (8)

"correctly set up and implemented system" - what would be an example of such? - carcass93 11:59:19 01/11/12 (2)

RE: "correctly set up and implemented system" - what would be an example of such? - Thorsten 12:53:34 01/17/12 (0)

+1 -t - Sordidman 17:25:23 01/11/12 (0)

HiFi+? - fmak 07:20:27 01/08/12 (4)

RE: HiFi+? - Bob_C 19:37:21 01/08/12 (3)

RE: HiFi+?Have you - fmak 23:59:32 01/08/12 (1)

RE: HiFi+?Have you - Bob_C 10:08:09 01/09/12 (0)

RE: HiFi+? - Beetlemania 21:36:51 01/08/12 (0)

RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Dawnrazor 00:39:17 01/08/12 (8)

You got it! [RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Bromo33333 07:56:49 01/08/12 (7)

RE: You got it! [RE: WAV better than FLAC accoring to Absolute Sound.. - Thorsten 09:19:21 01/08/12 (6)

How many sources use USB out besides computers? - Dynobot 10:37:04 01/08/12 (5)

RE: How many sources use USB out besides computers? - Thorsten 11:44:11 01/08/12 (4)

RE: How many sources use USB out besides computers? - Dynobot 13:36:07 01/08/12 (1)

RE: How many sources use USB out besides computers? - Thorsten 15:03:38 01/08/12 (0)

Interesting...Thanks for the info[nt] - Dynobot 11:55:41 01/08/12 (1)

RE: Interesting...Thanks for the info[nt]-He - fmak 01:23:25 01/12/12 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable" - PeterZ 06:58:08 01/10/12 (1)

RE: Please explain why my reason is "inapplicable" - Tony Lauck 10:40:18 01/11/12 (0)

Post a Message!