Topic - OTL vs SET - saki70 13:48:31 01/11/15 (59)

• I will chime in here - morricab 01:40:27 01/26/15 (15)
• RE: I will chime in here - Lew 20:44:28 01/26/15 (2)
• RE: I will chime in here - berni 01:33:30 01/27/15 (1)
• Morricab mentioned it - Lew 06:43:31 01/27/15 (0)
• RE: I will chime in here - throwback 05:58:55 01/26/15 (11)
• Marigo wire - Lew 07:21:34 01/28/15 (6)
• RE: Marigo wire - throwback 19:55:51 01/28/15 (5)
• RE: Marigo wire - Lew 07:26:46 01/29/15 (1)
• RE: Marigo wire - horn kid 06:00:02 03/06/15 (0)
• RE: Marigo wire - 20202tom 00:01:21 01/29/15 (2)
• RE: Marigo wire - throwback 05:43:49 01/29/15 (1)
• RE: Marigo wire - 20202tom 07:22:49 01/29/15 (0)
• RE: I will chime in here - c1ferrari 20:00:42 01/27/15 (3)
• RE: I will chime in here - throwback 20:22:38 01/27/15 (2)
• RE: I will chime in here - c1ferrari 20:53:57 01/27/15 (1)
• RE: I will chime in here - throwback 06:12:19 01/28/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - Caucasian Blackplate 18:36:02 01/13/15 (18)
• As you might imagine, I'm having a problem with this - Ralph 10:40:17 01/14/15 (16)
• RE: As you might imagine, I'm having a problem with this - Caucasian Blackplate 20:03:58 01/15/15 (3)
• averages - Ralph 09:16:17 01/16/15 (2)
• RE: averages - Caucasian Blackplate 10:12:52 01/16/15 (1)
• RE: averages - Ralph 11:29:53 01/16/15 (0)
• RE: As you might imagine, I'm having a problem with this - cpotl 12:57:08 01/14/15 (11)
• RE: more on output impedance - Ralph 13:30:09 01/14/15 (10)
• RE: more on output impedance - cpotl 19:53:44 01/14/15 (9)
• RE: more on output impedance - Ralph 10:08:07 01/15/15 (8)
• RE: more on output impedance - cpotl 05:15:27 01/17/15 (3)
• There's gotta be a bug somewhere - Ralph 10:05:05 01/19/15 (2)
• RE: There's gotta be a bug somewhere - cpotl 05:33:40 01/21/15 (1)
• Sounds/looks like we are on the same page here - Ralph 08:28:21 01/21/15 (0)
• RE: more on output impedance - cpotl 07:51:54 01/16/15 (3)
• RE: more on output impedance - Ralph 09:21:42 01/16/15 (2)
• RE: more on output impedance - cpotl 09:29:35 01/16/15 (1)
• Yes. nt - Ralph 09:38:55 01/16/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - cpotl 22:16:04 01/13/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - groovy.guru 12:20:02 01/12/15 (6)
• RE: OTL vs SET - groovy.guru 20:50:53 01/12/15 (1)
• A bit of a generalization... - Ralph 09:32:09 01/13/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - c1ferrari 16:37:38 01/12/15 (2)
• RE: OTL vs SET - groovy.guru 18:22:18 01/12/15 (1)
• RE: OTL vs SET - c1ferrari 18:31:16 01/12/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - Catastrofe 13:13:11 01/12/15 (0)
• I've played with a few SETs - Ralph 11:26:19 01/12/15 (0)
• The speaker's the thing... - Lew 08:58:37 01/12/15 (8)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - throwback 06:37:12 01/13/15 (4)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - Lew 08:33:04 01/13/15 (3)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - throwback 12:34:07 01/13/15 (2)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - saki70 13:28:28 01/13/15 (1)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - Catastrofe 08:32:40 01/14/15 (0)
• RE: The speaker's the thing... - saki70 10:55:04 01/12/15 (2)
• Agree with Ralph... - Lew 08:34:05 01/13/15 (0)
• Actually that should work just fine - Ralph 11:19:25 01/12/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - Cousin Billy 18:12:58 01/11/15 (6)
• RE: OTL vs SET - blakey 15:41:33 01/20/15 (3)
• RE: OTL vs SET - berni 04:45:17 01/21/15 (2)
• RE: OTL vs SET - blakey 14:32:31 01/21/15 (1)
• RE: OTL vs SET - berni 23:46:12 01/22/15 (0)
• RE: OTL vs SET - sk 03:27:44 01/12/15 (1)
• RE: OTL vs SET - collinslaw@fuse.net 08:17:37 01/12/15 (0)