In Reply to: RE: Hold it!!! posted by cpotl on October 4, 2014 at 05:29:27:
"...this kind of response sounds hauntingly reminiscent of the response of when a scientist's investigation fails to confirm the occurrence of the claimed phenomenon."I would say better: "...when a scientist's investigation succeeds in falsifying the occurrence of the claimed phenomenon".
I simply said that, however and for sure, I would give the same answer that Ms Clark expects by his tests. Why are you not happy for that? But you should concede that in science it matters to interpret the phenomenon that occurred during these tests, i.e, that no differences were perceived. You repute a spoon-bender or a mind-reader who hypothesizes that other causes would explain the sonic identity. But, why are we forced to eat the meal that Mr Clark (and you) are offering?
Roberto
Edits: 10/05/14 10/07/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 06:04:45 10/04/14 (0)