In Reply to: RE: Hold it!!! posted by roio on October 2, 2014 at 10:57:33:
If you don't think it "deserves" to be verified, that's fine with me.
As a scientist, I would say that my idea can be taken as a hypothesis which could be tested by actual experiments, if one wished to do so. Unfortunately, once our instruments (scope, distortion meter, etc) would fail to reveal an effect, then we will be left with subjective judgement. That unknown variable could be somewhat controlled by having a panel of listeners and the use of double-blind testing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hold it!!! - Lew 12:11:41 10/02/14 (17)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 14:20:34 10/02/14 (15)
- RE: Hold it!!! - Banat 06:29:28 10/03/14 (1)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 06:33:30 10/03/14 (0)
- RE: Hold it!!! - cpotl 16:54:33 10/02/14 (12)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 02:22:58 10/03/14 (11)
- RE: Hold it!!! - cpotl 05:50:16 10/03/14 (10)
- RE: Hold it!!! - Lew 07:28:31 10/03/14 (2)
- RE: Hold it!!! - throwback 11:07:14 10/03/14 (1)
- Case in point that you already know about... - Lew 13:56:44 10/03/14 (0)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 06:30:50 10/03/14 (6)
- RE: Hold it!!! - cpotl 06:55:31 10/03/14 (5)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 07:55:25 10/03/14 (4)
- RE: Hold it!!! - cpotl 21:14:27 10/03/14 (3)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 03:33:14 10/04/14 (2)
- RE: Hold it!!! - cpotl 05:29:27 10/04/14 (1)
- RE: Hold it!!! - roio 06:04:45 10/04/14 (0)
- RE: Hold it!!! - throwback 12:16:32 10/02/14 (0)