In Reply to: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again posted by Tre' on August 17, 2011 at 14:53:50:
By real Class A I mean that the two halves of the wave form for each triode are symmetrical.
IOW, by 'real class A' you mean class A1.
BTW the actual waveforms we get off of an individual triode's cathode differs from the simulation in that it lacks the flat spot at the bottom of the curve unless the amp is driven into clipping.
I have run these amps with these output transformers before and they sound way better than any transformerless circlotron amp I have ever heard.
I've been castigated on the forums a number of times over the use of the word 'better' so these days I usually define it, however I'm pretty sure that you've not listened to any of the newer circuits out there in a while. You might want to avail yourself of that when you get a chance...
There is a very nice and rather long thread on diyaudio.com where some interesting ideas are presented. It is by no means the only thread where such occurs. For example there is another one about a hybrid Circlotron that uses an input coupling transformer for the output section, using MOSFETs for the output devices. We've built something similar in a tube embodiment, with a single-ended voltage amplifier and driver circuit. The simplicity offered works out very nicely for the guitar amp in which the circuit is used.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 13:08:02 08/23/11 (45)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 14:30:04 08/24/11 (0)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 19:26:49 08/23/11 (43)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 08:59:54 08/24/11 (42)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 10:26:09 08/24/11 (41)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Ralph 13:47:47 08/24/11 (5)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 14:39:43 08/24/11 (4)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Lew 14:52:00 08/24/11 (3)
- RE: Thinking about running my non-OTL Circlotron again - Tre' 15:05:03 08/24/11 (0)
- Whoops! - Lew 14:57:15 08/24/11 (1)
- RE: Whoops! - Tre' 15:13:40 08/24/11 (0)
- Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Tre' 11:45:35 08/24/11 (34)
- RE: Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Ralph 14:10:13 08/24/11 (33)
- RE: Micheal Rothacher understands Class A - Tre' 14:50:57 08/24/11 (32)
- RE: Sheesh - Ralph 08:10:56 08/25/11 (31)
- RE: Sheesh - Tre' 19:44:03 08/25/11 (29)
- How about an actual experiment? - cnpope 09:17:45 08/26/11 (28)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 11:04:18 08/26/11 (27)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - cnpope 12:04:23 08/26/11 (26)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Ralph 11:53:30 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 12:28:17 08/26/11 (24)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Jack Williams 15:40:04 08/26/11 (23)
- RE: How about an actual experiment? - Tre' 17:46:24 08/26/11 (22)
- "Ask Kurt Strain about this issue." - kurt s 23:43:12 08/29/11 (7)
- Thanks, Kurt... - Lew 13:29:50 08/30/11 (6)
- Paul Speltz did the wrong thing - kurt s 18:10:04 08/30/11 (5)
- RE: Paul Speltz did the wrong thing - Lew 07:08:04 08/31/11 (4)
- Here is Paul Speltz' post on circlotron output Z... - Lew 07:40:22 08/31/11 (3)
- I see that really Paul almost did the wrong thing. - kurt s 20:02:04 08/31/11 (2)
- Output Z of cathode follower... - Lew 20:51:46 09/01/11 (1)
- RE: Output Z of cathode follower... - kurt s 00:42:47 09/02/11 (0)
- In truth, Tre',... - Lew 23:42:21 08/27/11 (1)
- RE: In truth, Tre',... - Tre' 08:01:36 08/28/11 (0)
- King Ralph - GFL 06:39:53 08/27/11 (11)
- Is this you again Tre', using a different moniker? - Duke 19:46:19 08/28/11 (10)
- No, it is not me. - Tre' 21:33:06 08/28/11 (9)
- Uncanny resemblance in writing styles - Duke 22:05:37 08/28/11 (8)
- Hi Duke - Lew 13:17:54 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Ralph 12:32:56 08/30/11 (2)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Duke 15:06:07 08/30/11 (1)
- RE: this FAQ has been on the website for over a year. - Ralph 15:31:42 08/30/11 (0)
- RE: Uncanny resemblance in writing styles - Tre' 22:12:02 08/28/11 (3)
- GoodFu++ingLuck - GFL 05:26:17 08/29/11 (2)
- RE: GoodFu++ingLuck = GFL? - Lew 17:34:32 08/29/11 (1)
- Bullying - GFL 06:39:56 09/05/11 (0)
- RE: Sheesh - Tre' 11:21:10 08/25/11 (0)