In Reply to: Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. posted by Lew on June 27, 2005 at 10:47:05:
My topology for a DC coupled OTL differs substantially from both the Futterman's and Circlotron's and it seems plenty viable to me, having given trouble free day-to-day use for seventeen years now. However, it wouldn't be wise for me to go into much detail about its specifics since I don't have the requisite intellectual property protection.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Tom Dawson 12:36:42 06/28/05 (9)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 07:05:15 06/29/05 (8)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:30:16 06/29/05 (6)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 12:35:22 06/29/05 (5)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 08:16:44 06/30/05 (4)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:27:19 06/30/05 (3)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 12:41:11 06/30/05 (2)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Lew 10:17:43 07/01/05 (1)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Rich Brkich 14:03:16 07/01/05 (0)
- Re: Curious why the O.T.L. board moves so much slower than the S.E.T. board. - Tom Dawson 08:19:38 06/29/05 (0)