[
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2007, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
64.228.183.102
In Reply to: RE: Message to group: RE: Conclusion of Freeze Effect Project posted by kerr on May 29, 2007 at 07:21:05
>I thought that showing genuine interest in advancing our collective understanding (mine as well, here) was what AA & PHP was all about? <
>> That was your mistake. <<
Apparently. (sigh) I guess I shouldn't have taken the Audio Asylum mission statement to actually mean what it said, since the recent actions of AA staff have contradicted those words.
>> PHP is a gathering place for naysayers, pseudo-scientists and others too lazy to listen to bark about scientific method, DBT's, proof and to generally remain with their heads buried in the sand. <<
Sweet. I couldn't have said it better myself...
>> That said, I tried the freezer test with my own CD's and did not hear any differences. <<
The freezer test is something that most can usually discern. But its very possible to do a "bad test" somehow, and miss it entirely. For example, I don't know what process you used. A proper freeze test takes about 2 days (because it is repeated twice), and involves a very slow thawing process each time (where the item would be wrapped in thick blanket, for example, to slow warm-up). And in this case, an unfrozen control CD copy would be necessary to compare to the frozen. I am sure you can hear differences in alternative audio, if the right tests were done.Objective Audiophile 2007
Follow Ups:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2007, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]