In Reply to: Your reading comprehension simply sucks. posted by unclestu on February 14, 2013 at 18:41:17:
Here you are lecturing me on PWB when you have steadfastly and stubbornly refused to accept any of the arguments presented by May over the years, choosing instead to cling to your outdated belief there MUST be some conventional explanation to what May says and what PWB says on their web site. Prime suspect - RFI/EMI. You see RFI/EMI behind every rock."If I read her correctly..." -- that's hilarious! You haven't read anything she said correctly. Let me remind you of your profound insights for Crystals and clocks: "They channel RFI." "They wick away RFI." Hahahaah!
If you are now rejecting all of your previous arguments in favor of May's explanations, let me know. But I suspect you are just being argumentative and intellectually dishonest.
Edits: 02/15/13 02/15/13
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Ironic, isn't it? - geoffkait 22:43:15 02/14/13 (11)
- Reading comprehension failure again - unclestu 11:43:58 02/15/13 (10)
- I'm very impressed - geoffkait 12:50:30 02/15/13 (9)
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - unclestu 15:18:44 02/15/13 (8)
- That's pretty silly - geoffkait 16:13:40 02/15/13 (7)
- Lets see.... - unclestu 17:58:23 02/15/13 (6)
- So what? - geoffkait 03:44:33 02/16/13 (5)
- Poor baby - unclestu 13:13:17 02/16/13 (4)
- This is your mind on drugs - geoffkait 15:00:52 02/16/13 (3)
- Duhhhh..... - unclestu 15:54:53 02/16/13 (2)
- Theory and Practice - Tony Lauck 08:48:42 02/17/13 (1)
- I believe we are - unclestu 12:24:44 02/17/13 (0)