In Reply to: Uh, Stu posted by geoffkait on February 14, 2013 at 16:27:34:
And sucks BIG time. You're just lucky most posters are way more polite than you deserve.
PWB suggests that many tweaks work upon the human organism: very much akin to biofeedback. OP suggests that using biofeedback measurements could determine the viability of certain tweaks. However, since certain practices, including yoga, can alter the biological factors of the individual, that would compromise the testing procedure.
QED.
And FWIW, May has been a strong proponent of the external influences of possible environmental factors (chemical, for example) affecting the individual perception. She has long proclaimed the information is already in the stored format and these influences (tweaks, that is) can simply clear the human perception, if I read her correctly.
Sheesh! You drop names like you actually read their writings, when the truth is your apparent knowledge isn't worth diddly. You certainly like to maintain that illusion however false that may be.
I believe Tony understands far more than you do
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Your reading comprehension simply sucks. - unclestu 18:41:17 02/14/13 (14)
- RE: Your reading comprehension simply sucks. - Tony Lauck 09:01:17 02/16/13 (1)
- Actually, I agree - geoffkait 09:53:19 02/16/13 (0)
- Ironic, isn't it? - geoffkait 22:43:15 02/14/13 (11)
- Reading comprehension failure again - unclestu 11:43:58 02/15/13 (10)
- I'm very impressed - geoffkait 12:50:30 02/15/13 (9)
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHA - unclestu 15:18:44 02/15/13 (8)
- That's pretty silly - geoffkait 16:13:40 02/15/13 (7)
- Lets see.... - unclestu 17:58:23 02/15/13 (6)
- So what? - geoffkait 03:44:33 02/16/13 (5)
- Poor baby - unclestu 13:13:17 02/16/13 (4)
- This is your mind on drugs - geoffkait 15:00:52 02/16/13 (3)
- Duhhhh..... - unclestu 15:54:53 02/16/13 (2)
- Theory and Practice - Tony Lauck 08:48:42 02/17/13 (1)
- I believe we are - unclestu 12:24:44 02/17/13 (0)