In Reply to: RE: Its taken from your link (NT) posted by Tony Lauck on February 29, 2012 at 12:05:46:
yuor specifically atate to read the results of the Princeton Pear papers.That is EXACTLY what I did. In other words I followed exactly the clues which you left any reader of the post that referred to the Princeton experiments, of which you left a link.Now, if you can't find my quotes, then it is very obvious that you haven't read the link that you left. I find that rather pathetic. You can watch an elementary video, but not read a link, which you have posted, and still make statements saying that that link supports your comments.
If you haven't bothered to read your very own links, I see absolutely no reason to enlighten you. Why spoon fed someone who quotes from a link which they have not even read?
Stu
PS. Are you are upset because I didn't leave specific page markers for you? If you're grumbling about the PEAR website, remember that you left that very link for the rest of us to wade through. What's good for the gander is good for the goose.
Edits: 03/02/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- In your link - unclestu 13:52:11 03/02/12 (4)
- RE: In your link - Tony Lauck 14:39:00 03/02/12 (3)