|
Isolation Ward From ebony pucks to magic foil, mystical and controversial tweaks. |
|
In Reply to: "Clark lies." posted by clarkjohnsen on August 22, 2007 at 08:47:54:
Check out the thread in Water Cooler where Clark actually uses an account I posted to erroneously claim that Yoko Ono's brother sold the gun to Mark Chapman who assassinated Lennon.
Message 198.151.12.10
Talk about making up stories!
Stu
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - DAC chips - georgelouis 16:04:13 08/18/07 (108)
- Don't matter as long as you use a test disk with a phase check track. * - mr grits 18:50:12 08/19/07 (2)
- Do you mean "polarity"? It's an important distinction. So if you do... - clarkjohnsen 08:18:20 08/20/07 (1)
- Do you have - unclestu52 12:38:46 08/20/07 (0)
- Hey, how about we start counting minutes until "One Trick Pony" shows up? - Enophile 00:19:38 08/19/07 (5)
- Let me guess... - Wellfed 00:23:16 08/23/07 (0)
- Hey, stop pickin' on Clarke... - rlw 16:45:08 08/20/07 (3)
- He can't mean me, Mr. Wainwright, because... - clarkjohnsen 08:48:12 08/21/07 (2)
- You managed to leave 'absolute polarity' off your list (!txt) - pburant 09:22:25 08/21/07 (1)
- absolut polarity - late 05:41:53 08/25/07 (0)
- RE: DAC chips - Ric Schultz 16:47:03 08/18/07 (96)
- My question just below, seems to be one that nobody cares to answer! - clarkjohnsen 08:42:08 08/21/07 (84)
- Your question has been answered over and over - Ted Smith 11:28:52 09/05/07 (55)
- "DAC chips don't make any assumptions about polarity." Who said they did? - clarkjohnsen 12:05:16 09/05/07 (54)
- "Does your car turn left or right when you turn the steering wheel clockwise?" - Ted Smith 12:12:42 09/05/07 (53)
- "Perhaps you didn't notice the post to which you were responding, or perhaps you didn't read it." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 12:24:02 09/05/07 (52)
- ANSI/EIA 560-1990 - unclestu52 15:30:42 09/05/07 (48)
- RE: ANSI/EIA 560-1990 - geoffkait 06:27:06 09/06/07 (47)
- "The Standard you reference is irrelevent." Quite right. Which is why it makes no sense... - clarkjohnsen 13:32:47 09/06/07 (29)
- May Well?? - rick_m 09:01:14 09/07/07 (27)
- " Please oh polarity guru, clear the air, we wait with bated breath." I see... - clarkjohnsen 09:09:35 09/07/07 (26)
- And I thought you wanted to teach. - rick_m 10:49:29 09/07/07 (24)
- "I was expecting you to help." And why do you suppose I've spent these hours with you... - clarkjohnsen 10:57:53 09/07/07 (23)
- Hey, my one liners to you are no worse than yours to myself and others. How does it feel? [nt] - Ted Smith 13:29:48 09/07/07 (2)
- Great, not to have to read another long, rather rude, and mistaken essay! (Since you asked...) nt - clarkjohnsen 11:00:44 09/08/07 (1)
- Same to ya buddy :) [nt] - Ted Smith 11:05:15 09/08/07 (0)
- RE: And guess what? - rick_m 12:28:35 09/07/07 (19)
- None of the above. - clarkjohnsen 10:40:48 09/08/07 (18)
- Sweet! I shall await the revelation with bated breath. -txt - rick_m 12:43:22 09/08/07 (17)
- I just told you the best part; have you no reaction? nt - clarkjohnsen 10:44:43 09/09/07 (16)
- RE: I just told you the best part; have you no reaction? nt - rick_m 13:00:37 09/09/07 (14)
- "My reaction to that is, which is right?" [Sigh] - clarkjohnsen 12:18:17 09/15/07 (13)
- Oh, right! - rick_m 14:41:10 09/15/07 (12)
- Indeed, but I'm looking for a way to make it more consistent. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:01:22 09/16/07 (7)
- Where are you looking? - rick_m 15:13:59 09/16/07 (6)
- Which standard should be THE standard? LOL! - clarkjohnsen 08:40:26 09/17/07 (5)
- LOL!!!!! - unclestu52 11:06:56 09/17/07 (0)
- RE: Which standard should be THE standard? LOL! - rick_m 09:36:48 09/17/07 (3)
- But what if they *like* rap? Then: Chinese and Japanese music? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:40:36 09/17/07 (2)
- Then we'd need to take it to the limit... - rick_m 10:02:28 09/17/07 (1)
- He's a heck of a lot easier listen than that Oriental droning. nt - clarkjohnsen 08:34:10 09/18/07 (0)
- That's where Clark's logic falls apart - unclestu52 15:16:54 09/15/07 (3)
- RE: That's where Clark's logic falls apart - rick_m 17:36:02 09/15/07 (2)
- RE: That's where Clark's logic falls apart - unclestu52 12:20:58 09/16/07 (1)
- RE: That's where Clark's logic falls apart - rick_m 15:03:26 09/16/07 (0)
- You answered only half - unclestu52 12:43:32 09/09/07 (0)
- Actually we hoped that you wanted to learn, but alas... [nt] - Ted Smith 10:21:47 09/07/07 (0)
- Wow! - unclestu52 14:51:55 09/06/07 (0)
- Standards - unclestu52 11:29:57 09/06/07 (16)
- RE: Standards - rick_m 12:26:22 09/06/07 (15)
- I'm game - unclestu52 14:36:55 09/06/07 (0)
- "As Clark would be quick to point out, may ALL be wrong." No, not quite. - clarkjohnsen 13:44:04 09/06/07 (13)
- You keep putting words in people's mouths - Ted Smith 15:42:06 09/06/07 (7)
- "Or you stand behind such flummery as..." - clarkjohnsen 09:05:34 09/07/07 (6)
- Maintaining polarity isn't a subjective question. - Ted Smith 10:19:15 09/07/07 (5)
- "All I have to do is use a scope with a well defined input." Unfortunately... - clarkjohnsen 10:48:20 09/07/07 (4)
- As I've mentioned over and over - Ted Smith 13:20:52 09/07/07 (2)
- "A CD with the correct polarity." No such animal! - clarkjohnsen 10:59:29 09/08/07 (1)
- "A CD with the correct polarity." Sure there is, the one that gets the result you want - Ted Smith 11:26:31 09/08/07 (0)
- The much maligned - unclestu52 11:27:37 09/07/07 (0)
- RE: "As Clark would be quick to point out, may ALL be wrong." No, not quite. - rick_m 14:25:50 09/06/07 (4)
- 'I want my system to meet spec and blow when the data says to." Aha! - clarkjohnsen 08:36:44 09/07/07 (3)
- RE: 'I want my system to meet spec and blow when the data says to." Aha! - rick_m 09:59:55 09/07/07 (2)
- "making sure that the nominal polarity of my system is correct." [Sigh] And just how... - clarkjohnsen 10:31:14 09/07/07 (1)
- AES 26 - unclestu52 11:43:34 09/07/07 (0)
- Pardon me, if you indeed read it you didn't understand it [nt] - Ted Smith 15:21:21 09/05/07 (2)
- "It is industry standard to have non-inverted output," he wrote... - clarkjohnsen 10:16:28 09/06/07 (1)
- You're right - unclestu52 11:34:51 09/06/07 (0)
- .wav editor. - ontrack2@gmail.com 02:23:12 09/03/07 (17)
- Is it able to "monitor" polarity? nt - clarkjohnsen 09:13:18 09/03/07 (16)
- RE: Is it able to "monitor" polarity? nt - ontrack2@gmail.com 18:27:07 09/03/07 (15)
- "How else would I have stated that it could be used?" That's easy! - clarkjohnsen 09:47:15 09/04/07 (14)
- Subframe=division of frame X10/100/1000 - ontrack2@gmail.com 18:28:10 09/04/07 (7)
- Appreciate the offer, but the pitch won't work without... - clarkjohnsen 09:21:01 09/05/07 (6)
- So close..yet, so far away (sigh) - ontrack2@gmail.com 10:20:35 09/05/07 (5)
- You're not going to close the sale when you behave so rudely. - clarkjohnsen 10:35:43 09/05/07 (4)
- RE: You're not going to close the sale when you behave so rudely. - ontrack2@gmail.com 12:52:37 09/05/07 (3)
- "Revisit your education and... don't come knocking around here unless you have a purchase order." LOL! - clarkjohnsen 13:04:56 09/05/07 (2)
- RE: "Revisit your education and... don't come knocking around here unless you have a purchase order." LOL! - ontrack2@gmail.com 17:00:33 09/05/07 (1)
- Money down the drain, money down the drain. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:02:54 09/07/07 (0)
- No DAC, preamp, amp, speaker or wire does what you are implying. - Ted Smith 10:01:13 09/04/07 (5)
- "Is this the whole root of your weird posts and questions about polarity?" Down, boy. - clarkjohnsen 11:20:48 09/04/07 (4)
- RE: "Is this the whole root of your weird posts and questions about polarity?" Down, boy. - unclestu52 11:31:37 09/05/07 (0)
- Have it your way, I'm just trying to help you, but ... [nt] - Ted Smith 12:15:01 09/04/07 (2)
- No, I was helping you. I answered your (implied) question! And the response? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:30:35 09/04/07 (1)
- Right, "None so blind as those who will not see..." [nt] - Ted Smith 14:20:06 09/04/07 (0)
- I guess as long as you can switch absolute polarity, it doesn't matter. - Enophile 14:19:25 08/21/07 (9)
- Actually since Clark rejects every (a long and boring tale) - unclestu52 15:58:21 08/21/07 (8)
- RE: Actually since Clark rejects every (a long and boring tale) - Ted Smith 17:09:43 08/21/07 (7)
- "Clark lies." - clarkjohnsen 08:47:54 08/22/07 (4)
- Clark lies. - unclestu52 21:02:05 08/24/07 (0)
- Charges, charges - unclestu52 13:02:44 08/22/07 (1)
- Irony - Cleantimestream 21:59:36 09/02/07 (0)
- Not "badmouthing correct absolute polarity," just saying there is more to Hi Fi that that alone. - Enophile 10:02:50 08/22/07 (0)
- Wow! - unclestu52 19:51:59 08/21/07 (1)
- Great analogy, sir. - Enophile 22:35:27 08/21/07 (0)
- How do you define the "input" polarity of a CD player? - clarkjohnsen 08:20:11 08/20/07 (1)
- ANSI/EIA 560-1990 - unclestu52 12:26:13 08/21/07 (0)
- RE: DAC chips - georgelouis 17:03:02 08/18/07 (1)
- Maybe - unclestu52 19:07:12 08/18/07 (0)
- RE: DAC chips - unclestu52 16:52:54 08/18/07 (6)
- RE: DAC chips - Keny 01:06:02 08/19/07 (5)
- Well..... - unclestu52 02:24:34 08/19/07 (4)
- RE: Well..... - Keny 10:32:44 08/19/07 (3)
- RE: Well..... - unclestu52 13:56:38 08/19/07 (2)
- RE: Well..... - Keny 15:57:04 08/19/07 (1)
- You are correct - unclestu52 17:08:19 08/19/07 (0)
- Be warned folks, its still another idoitic Polarity post. [nt] - Steve Cortez 16:18:24 08/18/07 (1)
- RE: Be warned folks, its still another idoitic Polarity post. [nt] - georgelouis 16:44:08 08/18/07 (0)
Follow Ups
- Clark lies. - unclestu52 21:02:05 08/24/07 (0)
[Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Take5 ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]
