|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
|
|
|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle posted by hahax@verizon.net on September 11, 2016 at 05:48:52:
Will you two please go get a room.
A closed box is not an infinite baffle. It's a mass-spring system.
And you cannot have a driver which is optimized for both bass reflex and closed box. The fact that one sounded tighter than the other can be attributed to several factors.
Of all the back-and-forth between you two, neither of you has shown even one single MLSSA graph, or gone any further than arguing about Merlot versus Cabernet.
I *get* that closed box doesn't do the "capacitor" thingy that bass reflex does, but the question is: In a well-designed system, can we hear it? If you cross a woofer at, for example, 100 Hz at 24 dB/octave, the "punch" and definition isn't even coming from the woofer. It's coming from the lower midrange driver.
Many years ago, I had the opportunity to learn from loudspeaker designer John Meyer (meyersound.com). He taught me a LOT about loudspeakers. Then, I read Olson's "Music, Physics and Engineering" and Dickason's "Loudspeaker Design Cookbook".
Other than from a purely theoretical perspective, a closed box is not necessarily better than a bass reflex box.
:)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Bass reflex vs acoustic suspension vs inf. baffle - Inmate51 09:32:16 10/21/16 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
