In Reply to: RE: You are not building a MLTL posted by gortnipper on June 28, 2012 at 15:41:02:
I currently don't have access to my correspondence with Jay, just recall that the MLTL designs I originally did were downsized quite a bit plus IIRC he had me relocate the driver to suit him, so the driver isn't where I would normally recommend either.
Regardless, with the specs you've posted, it's so close to a golden ratio cab that it's just a nice, smooth simming bottom vented BR.
I too would like to know what he means by "The GPA 604 deserves a freeware in-room MLTL and in-corner design" as I don't agree with the 'free' part per se, though I've posted some ~60-160" long ones on various forums for others over the last ~12 yrs.[no links currently available].
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean! As always though, the usual disclaimers apply to this post's contents.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 16:15:08 06/28/12 (8)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - gortnipper 20:05:31 06/28/12 (5)
- A more typical tall, high driver MLTL - scooter 21:05:19 06/30/12 (2)
- RE: A more typical tall, high driver MLTL - RC Daniel 01:50:33 07/01/12 (1)
- RC ... what T/S parameters for GPA 604 III are you using? - scooter 13:02:18 07/16/12 (0)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 20:21:59 06/28/12 (1)
- Sweet, thanks. - gortnipper 20:31:00 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - Inmate51 17:43:11 06/28/12 (1)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 18:18:09 06/28/12 (0)