In Reply to: You are not building a MLTL posted by scooter on June 27, 2012 at 22:36:05:
"Several papers discuss how a cabinet with a bottom floor port must be raised 1x to 2x the diameter of the port for correct port bass wave summation into the room."
OK - so my legs are 1.375x port diameter.
"You are not building a MLTL for your GPA 604"
You have to forgive me, as I am a novice, but why do you say that? 10ft3 design, dims per GM/Jay with pipe length=42.5" x-section area = 422.04"^2, 6" port 2" long, driver center at 19.625" down from top of pipe.
I am sorry, but I am not quite sure what you mean by, "The GPA 604 deserves a freeware in-room MLTL and in-corner design"?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - gortnipper 15:41:02 06/28/12 (9)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 16:15:08 06/28/12 (8)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - gortnipper 20:05:31 06/28/12 (5)
- A more typical tall, high driver MLTL - scooter 21:05:19 06/30/12 (2)
- RE: A more typical tall, high driver MLTL - RC Daniel 01:50:33 07/01/12 (1)
- RC ... what T/S parameters for GPA 604 III are you using? - scooter 13:02:18 07/16/12 (0)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 20:21:59 06/28/12 (1)
- Sweet, thanks. - gortnipper 20:31:00 06/28/12 (0)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - Inmate51 17:43:11 06/28/12 (1)
- RE: You are not building a MLTL - GM 18:18:09 06/28/12 (0)