|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
|
|
|
High Efficiency Speaker Asylum Need speakers that can rock with just one watt? You found da place. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? posted by waj4all on April 22, 2012 at 16:05:12:
The notion of spectral balance is a good one. The research goes back a long way - Snow I think had the best papers, from the twenties maybe? Anyhow, his experiments showed loss of perceived quality as the spectrum was limited at the high and low end. Later sources - which I have not been able to trace - advocated an equal loss at each end to preserve balance I can't say I've seen actual data to support this but it makes sense to me and agrees with my experience. Treble is much cheaper than bass - and mass-market speakers sound screechy to me!
Sorry for the sidetrack - it should really be another thread but I'm lazy :^)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Paul Joppa 19:39:20 04/24/12 (5)
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 22:39:50 04/24/12 (4)
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Paul Joppa 14:40:56 04/25/12 (1)
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - Inmate51 20:41:26 04/25/12 (0)
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - cids 06:53:53 04/25/12 (1)
- RE: Large Cones = More Realistic Lower-Mids Tone? - waj4all 09:01:53 04/25/12 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]