66.183.110.37
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: B&C DCM50 & DCX50 posted by JoshK on April 02, 2009 at 06:22:43
One thing I forgot to mention is that the DCM doesn't use a diaphragm typical of compression drivers. It's a paper cone. I haven't opened mine up for a look but looking in through the bug screen it's obviously a different beast.
Also a note is that according to Bill the DCM performs a little better over it's own range than the DCX in the same range. It made sense when I heard it though at first I had been favouring the Co-axial unit.
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup: