I am a relative newbie when it comes to DIY speaker projects. I could use some input from those with more experience, particularly when it comes to the various FR drivers now available.
Is is a fair characterization to say that all drivers with a wizzer cone will tend to shout? I have heard Lowthers and tend not to like them for this reason. Do the Fostex and others like the Hemp Acoustics drivers, which both have wizzers, do the same?
Thank you for your reply
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Wizzer cone question - jwr159 23:29:59 03/10/07 (23)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - Paul Joppa 23:58:16 03/12/07 (0)
- Whizzer cone = distortion. - sser2 21:35:17 03/11/07 (5)
- Whizzer cone = more extended frequency response - Duke 00:34:12 03/12/07 (4)
- That was a line of thinking of the person who invented it. - sser2 12:26:20 03/12/07 (3)
- Re: That was a line of thinking of the person who invented it. - Duke 13:22:35 03/12/07 (2)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - Duke 17:37:23 03/11/07 (0)
- I don't think R/S 40-1354's or Fostex FE-207E's shout - mhardy6647 14:03:53 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - Saturntube 11:10:52 03/11/07 (0)
- Expensive hope - ultrakaz 11:00:37 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - hutmacher 09:08:57 03/11/07 (0)
- Fostex FE166 - firstname.lastname@example.org 05:38:41 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - Kloss 05:05:41 03/11/07 (9)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - jwr159 09:54:02 03/11/07 (1)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - JANDG 17:17:09 03/11/07 (0)
- Re: Wizzer cone question - limono 09:52:41 03/11/07 (6)
- I've found the Fostexes I've heard to be much more palatable than the Lowthers - mhardy6647 09:55:22 03/12/07 (2)
- I can see why you disagree ;) - Kloss 06:18:43 03/12/07 (2)
You can not post to an archived thread.