In Reply to: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? posted by freddyi on March 3, 2007 at 11:07:55:
Greets!Not sure what you're getting at, but these are BPs, so a basic one would be a type 2. Using an old version of LspCad and Altec's 604E's published specs I did a typical K alignment at 75 W rated power with 19 mm thickness vents. Note that the front vent ~ = Sd and that cone excursion doesn't exceed Xmax and that if an extra resonant chamber was added between the two tuned to ~70 Hz, then it would be well below Xmax and the roll-off would be more linear, just as you've seen/measured.
Anyway, as the front vent is reduced in area, the 3rd peak shifts lower in frequency/higher in amplitude, flattening the response and of course, vice versa. If each resonant chamber was increased in length to bring 1/4 WL damping to the vents, then they could be bigger for a given duct length, with even higher driver damping.
Did this answer your Q?
GM
Loud is Beautiful if it's Clean!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? - GM 14:56:30 03/03/07 (6)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? - freddyi 17:49:14 03/03/07 (5)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? - GM 18:50:29 03/03/07 (4)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? - freddyi 22:08:11 03/03/07 (3)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? - GM 02:06:25 03/04/07 (2)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? 3rd Z peaks - freddyi 07:29:20 03/04/07 (1)
- Re: Karlson-coupler aspect - what might be juggled for aspect & performance? 3rd Z peaks - GM 15:55:08 03/04/07 (0)